婚内共同财产分割规则之适用研究
发布时间:2018-03-24 00:33
本文选题:《婚姻法解释(三)》第4条 切入点:婚内共同财产 出处:《浙江大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:2011年施行的《最高人民法院关于适用婚姻法若干问题的解释(三)》的第4条确立了我国婚内共同财产分割规则。本文以中国裁判文书网收录的2012-2016年100份左右婚内共同财产分割纠纷案件的裁判文书为分析样本,从案件案由、裁判依据、分割标准等方面对该规则在司法实践中的适用情况做一个较为全面的观察和分析,以期正确理解和适用婚内共同财产分割规则。除开引言和结语,本文分为三部分:第一部分为"司法视阈下的婚内共同财产分割规则"。在中国裁判文书网,以"《最高人民法院关于适用婚姻法若干问题的解释(三)》第四条"为关键字,共检索到300多份,包含同一案件的一审、二审乃至再审的裁判文书,起讫时间为2012年4月19日至2016年12月5日。经过筛选,排除未实际涉及婚内共同财产分割的案件、少数内容重复的判决书、没有实质内容的裁定书后,得到100份左右有分析价值的裁判文书。经过分析,审判实践中出现了同案不同判现象和法律适用不统一问题。具体如案由不一,裁判依据不一,分割标准不一。第二部分为"解释论视角下的婚内共同财产分割规则"。首先,探究《婚姻法解释(三)》第4条的法理基础,其次明确《婚姻法解释(三)》第4条的适用前提,再次具体分析《婚姻法解释(三)》第4条的第1项和第2项,最后明晰婚内共同财产分割标准。第三部分为"婚内共同财产分割规则之实务建议"。建议有三个,一是设计专门案由以明确法律关系,二是梳理裁判思路以总结审判经验,三是发布指导案例以统一法律适用。
[Abstract]:Article 4 of the interpretation of the Supreme people's Court on the Application of Marriage Law (3) adopted in 2011 establishes the rules for the division of common property within marriage in China. The adjudicative documents in cases of joint property division disputes are analysis samples, This paper makes a comprehensive observation and analysis on the application of this rule in judicial practice from the aspects of the case cause, the basis of adjudication, the criterion of division, and so on, in order to correctly understand and apply the rule of division of common property in marriage. This article is divided into three parts: the first part is "rules of the division of marital common property under the judicial sight". In China's judgment documents Network, the key words are "interpretation of certain issues concerning the Application of Marriage Law by the Supreme people's Court (3) > Article 4" as the key word. A total of more than 300 documents have been retrieved, including the first instance, second instance and even retrial of the same case, starting from 19 April 2012 to December 5, 2016. After screening, the cases that did not actually involve the division of joint property within marriage were excluded. After a small number of repeated judgments, without substantive decisions, about 100 documents of analytical value were obtained. After analysis, In the trial practice, there appear the problems of different judgments and inconsistent application of the law in the same case, such as the different reasons, the different basis of the judgment, the different standards of division. The second part is the rules of the division of common property in marriage from the angle of interpretation theory. First of all, This paper probes into the legal basis of Article 4 of the interpretation of Marriage Law (3), then clarifies the applicable premise of Article 4 of the interpretation of Marriage Law (3), and then concretely analyzes the first and second items of Article 4 of the interpretation of Marriage Law (3). Finally, the criteria for the division of common property in marriage are clarified. The third part is "practical suggestions on the rules of division of common property in marriage". There are three suggestions, one is to design a special case to clarify the legal relationship, the other is to sort out the thinking of the judge in order to sum up the experience of the trial. Third, issue guidance cases to unify the application of the law.
【学位授予单位】:浙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923.9
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 罗冠男;;意大利夫妻财产制度的历史发展与现状[J];比较法研究;2015年06期
2 陶玉;;婚姻关系存续期间分割夫妻共同财产的考量[J];人民司法;2012年04期
3 裴桦;;也谈婚内共同财产分割 兼评最高人民法院《关于适用〈婚姻法〉若干问题的解释(三)》(草稿)第15条[J];法律适用;2010年01期
,本文编号:1655933
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hyflw/1655933.html