事实婚姻法律制度重构

发布时间：2018-03-26 16:12

本文选题：制度重构　切入点：立法模式　出处：《广东财经大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：事实婚姻是相对于法律婚姻而存在的一个概念,我国《婚姻法》并没有对事实婚姻给出明确的界定,但法律规定的缺失并不意味着事实婚姻不存在。相反,事实婚姻无论城市还是农村都大量存在。因为法律的缺位,这些事实婚姻关系在解除时引发很多问题,使得弱势方的合法权益无法得到相应的法律保护。论文在借鉴前辈们理论成果的基础上,围绕事实婚姻法律制度的重构展开研究。首先,对事实婚姻的概念进行了界定,并通过对比分析的方法点明了事实婚姻的特征,在此基础上,进一步理清了事实婚姻与非婚同居的区别;其次,对事实婚姻的现状及事实婚姻制度重构的必要性进行了分析,同时梳理了事实婚姻立法在我国的演变,明确指出了我国事实婚姻立法存在的问题与不足;然后放眼世界主要国家关于事实婚姻的立法状况,分析了域外立法对我国的借鉴及启示作用;最后提出我国事实婚姻法律制度重构的原则和立法模式,在具体的重构内容上建议我国有条件的将仪式婚纳入法律保护的范围内,在立法上明确事实婚姻关系的认定条件,确立事实婚姻的司法认定程序,将事实婚姻关系的认定权赋予法官,对符合条件并经过司法程序认定的事实婚姻赋予与合法婚姻相同的法律效力,以此作为解决事实婚姻问题的终极方法。
[Abstract]:De facto marriage is a concept that exists relative to legal marriage. Our Marriage Law does not give a clear definition of de facto marriage, but the absence of legal provisions does not mean that de facto marriage does not exist. De facto marriages exist in large numbers, both in urban and rural areas. Because of the absence of laws, these de facto marriages cause many problems when they are dissolved. It makes the legal rights and interests of the vulnerable party unable to get the corresponding legal protection. On the basis of drawing lessons from the theoretical achievements of the predecessors, the paper studies on the reconstruction of the legal system of de facto marriage. First, the concept of de facto marriage is defined. On the basis of this, the difference between de facto marriage and non-marital cohabitation is further clarified. Secondly, the present situation of de facto marriage and the necessity of reconstructing the system of de facto marriage are analyzed. At the same time, it combs the evolution of the legislation of de facto marriage in our country, points out the problems and shortcomings of the legislation of de facto marriage in our country, and then looks at the legislative situation of the major countries in the world on the legislation of de facto marriage. Finally, the author puts forward the principles and legislative models of the reconstruction of the legal system of de facto marriage in our country, and suggests that our country should bring ritual marriage into the scope of legal protection in the concrete reconstruction content. In legislation, it is clear that the conditions of determining the relationship of factual marriage, establishing the procedure of judicial cognizance of de facto marriage, and endowing the judge with the right of ascertaining the relationship of factual marriage. As the ultimate method to solve the problem of de facto marriage, the de facto marriage which meets the conditions and is recognized by the judicial procedure is given the same legal effect as the legal marriage.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.9

【参考文献】