物权法视角下的夫妻共有房屋的认定与处分

发布时间：2018-06-03 13:41

本文选题：物权法 + 夫妻共有房屋　；参考：《山东大学》2009年硕士论文

【摘要】： 《物权法》的实施,对家庭财产关系产生了重要的影响。本文主要围绕一个案例展开对夫妻共有房屋认定与处分的相关论述。之所以把夫妻共有房屋从众多家庭财产中独立出来进行论述,主要是由于房屋作为不动产,价值较大,是家庭财产的重要组成部分,对于维系家庭的存续和稳定,具有重要作用。文章首先对一个物权法案件进行评析,列出了合议庭的两种不同意见,以及法院的最终判决结果。其次,文章解析了《物权法》施行前后,对此类案件的不同处理态度。《物权法》施行之前,对此类案件的处理主要根据的是《婚姻法》及《民法通则》的相关规定,对于夫妻共有房屋应由双方共同处分,一方擅自处分属于无权处分；而《物权法》施行之后,首次在法律上确定了不动产的善意取得制度,即：房屋权属证书上登记的权利人擅自处分夫妻共有房屋的,第三人在善意且无过失的情况下,可依善意取得制度取得房屋所有权。再次,文章对《物权法》涉及到的夫妻共有房屋认定与处分的相关理论进行了论述,包括物权公示原则、善意取得制度以及共有制度,并与《婚姻法》相关规定进行了比较,对于二者之间的冲突进行了评价,认为二者并不存在实质意义上的冲突。最后,文章在对我国房屋所有权登记要求、现状及弊端进行分析的基础上,提出了保护夫妻共有房屋所有权的几点建议。
[Abstract]:The implementation of the Real right Law has had an important impact on family property relations. This paper mainly focuses on a case to discuss the identification and disposition of the couple's common house. The reason why the couple's common house is independently discussed from many family properties is mainly because the house, as a real estate, is of great value and is an important part of the family property. It is important to maintain the survival and stability of the family. Play an important role. This paper first analyzes a real right law case, lists two different opinions of the collegial panel and the final judgment result of the court. Secondly, the article analyzes the different attitudes to this kind of cases before and after the implementation of the property Law. Before the implementation of the Real right Law, the handling of such cases is mainly based on the relevant provisions of the Marriage Law and the General principles of Civil Law. For the joint disposition of a couple's common house, one party's unauthorized disposition is not entitled; and after the implementation of the property Law, the system of acquisition of real estate in good faith has been legally established for the first time. Namely: the owner of the right registered on the certificate of ownership of the house disposes of the joint house without authorization, the third party can acquire the ownership of the house according to the system of bona fide acquisition in good faith and no fault. Thirdly, the article discusses the related theories of the identification and disposition of the common house of husband and wife, including the principle of publicity of real right, the system of acquisition in good faith and the system of joint ownership, and compares with the relevant provisions of the Marriage Law. The conflict between them is evaluated and it is concluded that there is no real conflict between them. Finally, based on the analysis of the requirements, present situation and disadvantages of housing ownership registration in China, this paper puts forward some suggestions to protect the joint house ownership of husband and wife.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D923.2

【引证文献】