我国同性伴侣权益保护研究

发布时间：2018-06-17 09:20

本文选题：同性伴侣 + 权益保护　；参考：《中南林业科技大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着同性群体的非病理化论证以及国际社会对人权的重视,同性伴侣们对自身正当权益保护的诉求愈演愈烈。截至目前为止,全球共有二十二个国家成功地以不同的形式实现了同性结合合法化。我国当前的法律对于同性伴侣关系是不予承认的,其权益保护也因此被虚置。对于同性婚姻合法化虽然可以以时机未到为由而回避,但是对同性伴侣具体权益的保护问题却亟待解决。同性伴侣权益是指从人权角度出发,追求长期稳定生活状态的相同性别的双方所应当享有的权益。我国目前对同性伴侣权益保护的立法处于空白状态,我国同性伴侣所能受到的有限保护也是基于其一般民事主体身份,同性伴侣共同生活的关系和身份并未得到正视,所以说我国同性伴侣权益保护存在着较大的缺失。而形式婚姻、艾滋病的传播、犯罪的增加等一系列问题的出现又催促着我们对该群体的权益保护作出回应,且同性伴侣作为我国社会中的客观存在,有其深厚的社会根源,自由平等的法理基础也要求其正当权益受法律保护。通过考察域外主要国家同性伴侣权益保护的四种模式,包括以荷兰为代表的同性婚姻模式、以英国为代表的民事伴侣模式、以法国为代表的民事契约模式以及以澳大利亚为代表的事实伴侣关系模式,并分析不同模式下同性伴侣权益保护的具体内容,涉及到人身权和财产权等方面,可以看出各国都采用了适合本国国情的模式来应对同性伴侣权益保护的问题,且立法道路曲折而备受争议。所以我国可以借鉴域外国家的经验,结合我国学者的立法建议,从法解释的近期目标和立法设想的远期目标两种途径出发,通过对现有法律的解释来保护我国同性伴侣权益,以及设计适合我国同性伴侣的《民事伴侣法》,并在财产关系的设计中融入同性伴侣特色。
[Abstract]:With the nonpathological argumentation of same-sex groups and the attention paid by the international community to human rights, the demands of same-sex couples to protect their legitimate rights and interests become more and more serious. So far, 22 countries around the world have successfully legalized same-sex unions in different forms. The current law of our country does not recognize same-sex partnership, and the protection of its rights and interests is therefore void. Although the legalization of same-sex marriage can be avoided on the grounds that the time has not come, the protection of the specific rights and interests of same-sex couples needs to be solved. The rights and interests of same-sex couples refer to the rights and interests of the same sex who pursue long-term stable living conditions from the point of view of human rights. At present, the legislation on the protection of the rights and interests of same-sex couples in China is in a blank state. The limited protection of same-sex couples in our country is also based on their general civil subject status, and the relationship and status of same-sex couples living together has not been squarely addressed. Therefore, there is a greater lack of protection of the rights and interests of same-sex couples in China. However, the emergence of a series of problems, such as formal marriage, the spread of AIDS and the increase in crime, has prompted us to respond to the protection of the rights and interests of this group. As an objective existence in our society, same-sex couples have their profound social roots. The legal basis of freedom and equality also requires that their legitimate rights and interests be protected by law. By examining four modes of protecting the rights and interests of same-sex couples in major extraterritorial countries, including the model of same-sex marriage represented by the Netherlands and the model of civil partnership represented by the United Kingdom, The civil contract model represented by France and the de facto partnership model represented by Australia, and the specific contents of the protection of the rights and interests of same-sex couples under different models are analyzed, including personal rights and property rights, etc. It can be seen that all countries adopt a model suitable to their national conditions to deal with the protection of the rights and interests of same-sex couples, and the legislative road is tortuous and controversial. Therefore, China can draw lessons from the experience of foreign countries, combine with the legislative suggestions of Chinese scholars, proceed from the two ways of the short-term goal of legal interpretation and the long-term goal envisaged by the legislation, and protect the rights and interests of same-sex couples through the interpretation of the existing laws. And to design the civil partnership law suitable for our country's same-sex couples, and to incorporate the characteristics of same-sex partners in the design of property relations.
【学位授予单位】：中南林业科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.9

【相似文献】