登记行为补助行为说之质疑——兼与刘保玉教授商榷

发布时间：2018-01-14 18:18

本文关键词：登记行为补助行为说之质疑——兼与刘保玉教授商榷　出处：《求是学刊》2015年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：《不动产登记暂行条例》公布实施,对于保障和促进我国市场经济体制在不动产领域的发展具有重要意义。但该条例并未明确登记机构登记行为性质。不动产登记作为一个整体,由当事人所实施的申请登记的私法行为和登记机构所实施的登记审查的公法行为共同构成。不能将作为公法性质的登记机构登记行为界定为民事行为中的补助行为。我国的不动产登记不能想当然解释为物权行为,从登记机构登记行为的性质、登记行为与补助行为的区别及补助行为功能角度分析,将登记机构的登记行为界定为补助行为,并不妥当。登记行为并非补助行为,并不影响登记机构因错误登记所应承担的民事侵权责任性质。
[Abstract]:"Provisional Regulations on real estate registration > promulgated, for the protection and promotion of the market economic system of our country has important significance in the development of the real estate sector. But the regulations do not clear the registration nature of registration. The registration of real estate as a whole, the implementation of the law by the parties to the registration examination please private behavior and the implementation of the registration institutions constitute the registration institutions. Not as a behavior of the nature of public law is defined as subsidy behavior in civil behavior. China's real estate registration cannot be interpreted as real right behavior most probably it did not actually happen, from the nature of Registration Act board record, analysis angle difference and grant registration act and function grant, the registration registration agency is defined as the subsidy behavior is not appropriate. The registration act is not a subsidy behavior, does not affect the registration authority for registration shall bear the error The nature of civil liability for tort.

【作者单位】：黑龙江大学法学院;
【基金】：黑龙江省社科基金项目“不动产登记制度研究”,项目编号:12B077 黑龙江省教育厅项目“不动产登记制度研究”,项目编号:12532246
【分类号】：D923.2
【正文快照】： 一、问题的提出《不动产登记暂行条例》于2014年12月22日颁布,并于2015年3月1日正式实施。《条例》的颁布实施,是我国物权制度建设中具有里程碑意义的重大事件,对于保障和促进我国市场经济体制在不动产领域的发展,保障不动产权利人合法财产权具有重要意义。但该条例并未对《物

【参考文献】