错位与归位:民法典编纂中的司法解释

发布时间：2018-01-15 21:23

本文关键词：错位与归位:民法典编纂中的司法解释　出处：《学习与实践》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：应如何处理民法典与司法解释的关系,是民法典编纂绕不过去的疑题。我国的民商事司法解释主要包括综合类、创设类和细化类三类,针对这三类司法解释,应尽快组建专职的司法解释清理(整顿)委员会,由其负责从中剥离出若干有价值的规范,纳入民法典。在吸收方法上,创设类司法解释可采用规则吸收方法,综合类和细化类司法解释因未创设新规则可采用观念吸收方法。待民法典颁布后,应逐步限制最高院的司法解释权,同时适时扩张指导性案例制度的适用范围,藉此彻底理顺立法和司法解释的关系。
[Abstract]:How to deal with the relationship between the civil code and the judicial interpretation is the question of the non - past question of the codification of the Civil Code . The judicial interpretation of civil and commercial affairs in our country mainly includes three types of comprehensive categories , creation and refinement . In view of these three types of judicial interpretations , it is necessary to establish a full - time judicial interpretation and cleaning ( rectification ) committee , which can adopt the concept absorption method . After the promulgation of the Civil Code , the judicial interpretation right of the Supreme Court should be gradually restricted . At the same time , the application scope of the guidance case system should be expanded in time , so as to thoroughly straighten out the relationship between the legislation and the judicial interpretation .

【基金】：广西人文社会科学发展研究中心“科学研究工程·青年项目培育工程”项目“商事登记激励机制的法律构造”(项目编号:QNPY2015008)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923
【正文快照】： 当前,民法典编纂正在如火如荼地进行之中。[1]民法典编纂的首要目的在于实现立法的“体系化”和“科学化”,进而在中国民商法领域建立起一种健康合理的法源体系。[2]就此而论,如果民法典编纂试图绕开业已存在的、规模庞大的司法解释群体,将很难取得成功。遗憾的是,无论从民商

【相似文献】