对家畜伤人进行私力救济的责任承担及其处置——由连云港砍犬案引发的思考

发布时间：2018-01-16 18:04

本文关键词：对家畜伤人进行私力救济的责任承担及其处置——由连云港砍犬案引发的思考　出处：《山东警察学院学报》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：连云港砍犬案发生后,当地公安机关对该案进行了一系列处置,引发了一些争议。从公安机关承担的养犬审查职责来看,公安机关进行的仅是形式审查,对陈某骗取养犬许可证的违法行为不承担违法许可的责任,陈某应因弄虚作假骗取养犬许可证而受到行政处罚。陈某的犬属于野犬,王某有权捕杀,但应当对陈某承担赔偿责任。公安机关以故意毁坏财物罪追究王某责任和对其适用刑事拘留措施缺乏正当性。在处置家畜伤人类似案件时,公安机关应加强传舆论引导,转变执法理念,恪尽调查义务,强化联动机制。
[Abstract]:After Lianyungang chop off dog case, the local public security organ has carried on a series of disposition to this case, has caused some disputes. From the public security organ undertakes the dog maintenance examination duty, the public security organ only carries on the form examination. Chen does not bear the responsibility of illegal license to defraud the dog, Chen should be punished by administrative punishment for cheating the license. Chen's dog belongs to the wild dog, Wang has the right to kill. However, Chen should be liable for compensation. The public security organs to deliberately damage property to investigate Wang responsibility and the lack of legitimacy of the application of criminal detention measures. When dealing with livestock wounding similar cases. Public security organs should strengthen the guidance of public opinion, change the idea of law enforcement, fulfill the obligation of investigation, and strengthen the linkage mechanism.
【作者单位】：江苏省公安厅法制总队;
【分类号】：D920.5;D922.1;D923.2
【正文快照】： 一、案情简介 2016年7月5日22时许,江苏省连云港市居民陈某在其居住的小区内遛犬,期间该犬将王某女友李某某的手臂咬伤。两天后,王某为给其女友出气,叫上一名封姓男子与其一起驾车前往该小区寻找陈某。到达目的地后,两人恰好遇到正在遛犬的陈某。王某见状便从车后备箱中拿出

【参考文献】