分时度假合同解除的实证研究

发布时间：2018-01-16 19:37

本文关键词：分时度假合同解除的实证研究　出处：《中国社会科学院研究生院》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：分时度假通常指,多个消费者共同拥有同一套房产的使用权。在欧洲和美国,该种旅游度假产品从20世纪60年代诞生至今已经经历了多次创新和改进,逐渐适应和满足了大部分消费者的需求。在中国,分时度假是一种舶来品,人们开始接受这一概念仅仅是在30年以前。由于时间和国情的问题,其在我国的发展并不完善,期间产生的问题值得大家探讨。值得注意的是,在众多讨论声中,很少有人从实际案例出发讨论如何解决我国目前的分时度假纠纷。所以,本文通过分析现有的法院案例,讨论分时度假产品开发商、销售商与消费者之间产生的纠纷。案例的数据分析结果表明,目前商家和消费者之间的纠纷在诉讼请求上多体现为合同解除。本文主要讨论合同解除纠纷中法院支持解除合同的情况。法官支持解除合同的依据主要有:1.企业对外公开的《自律宣言》;2.《合同法》第九十三条;3.《合同法》第九十四条;4.《合同法》第一百二十四条、第二百五十一条、第二百六十八条;5.《合同法解释(二)》第二十六条;6.其他理由。通过对法官的判决依据进行学理上的划分,这些案例主要可以分为五类:约定解除、一般法定解除、特殊法定解除、更特殊的法定解除(情势变更下的解除)及其他解除理由。在个案分析中,笔者发现以上五类案例中值得讨论的问题分别为:《自律宣言》中冷静期的合同条款性质、合同目的的实现、特殊法定解除及分时度假合同的特征、情势变更与诚实信用原则的关系等问题。通过对以上问题的讨论和思考,笔者于文末提出了在《合同法》分则中设立“分时度假服务合同”一章的立法建议,以期达到解决分时度假消费者合同的现实问题以及为其预留立法空间的目的。
[Abstract]:Timeshare usually means that multiple consumers share the right to use the same property. In Europe and the United States, the product has undergone many innovations and improvements since its inception in 1960s. Gradually adapt to and meet the needs of most consumers. In China, timesharing is an imported product, people began to accept this concept only 30 years ago. Due to time and national conditions. Its development in our country is not perfect, during which the problems are worth discussing. Few people discuss how to solve the dispute of timeshare in our country from the actual cases. Therefore, this paper discusses the developers of timeshare products by analyzing the existing court cases. Disputes between the seller and the consumer. At present, the dispute between the merchant and the consumer is mostly embodied in the termination of the contract. This article mainly discusses the case that the court supports the dissolution of the contract in the dispute of the dissolution of the contract. The basis of the judge's support for the dissolution of the contract is mainly as follows:. (1) the self-discipline declaration of the enterprises which is open to the public; 2.Article 93th of the contract Law; 3.Article 94th of the contract Law; 4. Contract Law 124th, 251th, 268th; 5. interpretation of contract Law (2) > Article 26th; 6. Other reasons. Through the theoretical division of the basis of the judge's judgment, these cases can be divided into five main categories: agreed discharge, general statutory discharge and special statutory discharge. More specific statutory relief (release under change of circumstances) and other grounds for release. In case analysis. The author finds that the above five cases worth discussing are: the nature of the contract clause in the cooling-off period, the realization of the purpose of the contract, the characteristics of the special legal rescission and time-sharing contract. Based on the discussion and consideration of the above issues, the author puts forward the legislative proposals to establish the chapter of "timeshare service contract" in the sub-rule of contract Law. The purpose of this paper is to solve the problem of time-sharing consumer contract and to reserve legislative space for it.
【学位授予单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】