外观设计专利侵权损害赔偿研究

发布时间：2018-01-18 13:35

本文关键词：外观设计专利侵权损害赔偿研究　出处：《山东大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：我国《专利法》第65条规定了专利侵权损害赔偿的原则和四种计算方式：按照权利人因被侵权所受到的实际损失、按照侵权人因侵权所获得的利益、参照该专利许可使用费的倍数合理确定和人民法院定额赔偿。尽管有上述的多种损害赔偿数额的计算方式,但司法实务一直有诸多棘手问题。与国外相比,是否有可供借鉴的作法。本文在理定了外观设计专利及侵权的相关含义后,用两则案例将我国外观设计专利审判中常见的问题进行了分析和思考。在简要概括了外观设计专利的载体特点和分类后,通过对美国和日本关于全部市场价值规则与技术分摊技术的阐述和比较后,就完善我国当前外观设计专利侵权损害赔偿的适用提出了建议。本文共分为四个部分。第一部分是外观设计专利侵权损害赔偿基本理论。具体介绍了外观设计的定义、特征和侵权构成要件；外观设计专利侵权损害赔偿的含义、原则和赔偿范围、侵权损害赔偿的计算方法；第二部分通过两则判例引出我国外观设计专利侵权损害赔偿确定中存在的问题。第三部分通过比较法的视野对日本和美国的专利贡献度理论和适用进行了针对性的阐述,对外观设计专利载体进行了理论分类。第四部分在借鉴前述理论和操作的基础上提出了具体的完善建议：第一,以市场价值法为主,技术分摊法为辅；第二,增加侵权人的举证责任；第三,采用侵权人获利计算方法时,增加侵权人不提供获利材料的不利考量权重；第四,严格限制适用法定赔偿；第五,适当放宽证据适用规则。
[Abstract]:Article 65 of the Patent Law of our country stipulates the principle of compensation for patent infringement and four ways of calculation: according to the actual losses suffered by the obligee due to the infringement and the benefits obtained by the infringer as a result of the infringement. According to the patent licensing fee multiple reasonable determination and the people's court fixed compensation. Although there are a variety of damages above the amount of calculation, but judicial practice has been a lot of difficult problems. Compared with foreign countries. Whether there is a method to be used for reference. This paper has determined the meaning of design patent and infringement. This paper analyzes and ponders the common problems in the trial of design patents in China with two cases. After briefly summarizing the carrier characteristics and classification of design patents. Through the United States and Japan on the full market value rules and technology sharing technology after the elaboration and comparison. This article is divided into four parts. The first part is the basic theory of damages for patent infringement of design. Definition. Characteristics and constitutive elements of infringement; The meaning, principle and scope of damages for infringement of design patents, and the calculation method of compensation for infringement damages; The second part leads to the problems existing in the determination of damages for patent infringement of design in China through two cases. The third part aims at the theory and application of patent contribution in Japan and the United States through the perspective of comparative law. To explain. The author classifies the patent carrier of design in theory. Part 4th puts forward some specific suggestions on the basis of the theory and operation mentioned above: first, the method of market value is the main method, and the method of technology allocation is supplementary; Second, increase the burden of proof of the infringer; Third, when using the method of profit-making calculation of infringer, increase the weight of unfavorable consideration that the infringer does not provide profit-making material; 4th, strictly limit the application of statutory compensation; 5th, appropriate relaxation of the applicable rules of evidence.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.42

【共引文献】