商事表见代表责任的类型与适用

发布时间：2018-01-26 14:01

  本文关键词： 表见代表责任 登记不当 伪称代表 超越权限 体系构成　出处：《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：表见代表责任是与民法中的表见代理相对应的商法制度,在类型上应包括登记不当和伪称代表引起的无代表权的表见代表;超越代表权限和经营权限引起的超越权限的表见代表。由于引起表见代表的可信赖事实不同,每一种类型中表见代表责任的具体适用存在差异。其在法教义学归类上属于信赖责任范畴,因而在体系构成上,包括可信赖事实、第三人善意、第三人的信赖处置行为及其合理性、责任者的可归责性等构成要素。各构成要素因可信赖事实产生的路径和可信赖程度的不同而存在动态的适用过程,以此实现每一类型下的利益衡量。
[Abstract]:See the table on behalf of responsibility in civil law and the apparent agency corresponding to the commercial law system, the type should include no representation of the table and that caused by improper registration on behalf of the representative authority and see the representative; beyond the operating authority caused beyond the competence of the representative. Due to the apparent on behalf of trusted facts are different see, there are differences in the specific application of responsibility on behalf of each type. In the classification of dogmatics of law belongs to the reliance responsibility category, so in system structure, including reliable facts, third people in good faith, trust the disposal of Third People's behavior and its rationality, responsibility, accountability and other elements. The elements for trusted path facts and trustworthy degree are different for the dynamic process, in order to achieve each type of interest.

【作者单位】： 中南财经政法大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923
【正文快照】： 一、问题的提出 与民事表见代理制度类似,商法中存在表见代表制度,但民法中的表见代理和商法中的表见代表在类型和适用规则上并不一致。主要区别如下:其一,第三人的信赖对象与要求不同。表见代理需第三人对代理人的代理权和代理权限进行审查;而表见代表中第三人不需要对代表，

本文编号：1465795