论加框链接的著作权属性与侵权认定

发布时间：2018-01-27 13:53

本文关键词： 加框链接作品提供间接侵权实质呈现　出处：《中国政法大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：加框链接是互联网领域的一项重要技术,有关于其著作权属性也在国内外引发了剧烈争议。引发这一争议的根本原因在于,作品提供行为与互联网服务提供行为之间的界限划分存在模糊之处。本文试图通过对加框链接的概念、现行法之下加框链接的属性、加框链接侵权认定进行探讨,综合运用理论分析、案例分析以及比较分析的方法,对上述问题进行梳理,并且提出对加框链接制度设计的改进意见。本文结构可以归纳如下:第一章是对加框链接概念的界定。从技术角度澄清加框链接与普通链接、深层链接之间的区别,并且对加框链接的表现形式进行总结,为后续的讨论奠定概念性基础。同时,着重分析加框链接技术的运用为互联网用户所带来的正面影响,以及对著作权人、被链网站、互联网正版市场带来的负面影响。第二章是探讨加框链接的定性。本章主要立足于实证法的角度探讨当下的立法和司法对加框链接的定性。首先,从我国立法以及司法解释入手,并且结合的法官对法条和司法解释的解读,研究我国作品提供行为与网络服务提供行为的界限,以此界定我国加框链接目前被归为何种性质;然后,通过对大量司法判例的分析,总结在实践中法院对加框链接性质如何定性以及司法实践中面临的问题;最后,通过对美国、澳大利亚、德国等国家的相关立法和判例分析,总结其与我国对加框链接定性的异同。第三章是对加框链接侵权认定中的若干问题进行探讨。由于我国对互联网侵权的理论研究相对充足,故本文主要结合基础理论研究,直接对加框链接中出现的具体问题进行探讨。其中问题包括关键词搜索与定向搜索在侵权认定时的注意义务差异、合作链接与盗链的侵权认定以及破坏技术措施的侵权认定。第四章是对我国加框链接制度的反思。本章通过结合我国当下互联网市场的变动,对加框链接的制度重新反思,并且对此提出进一步的完善意见。
[Abstract]:A framed link is an important technology in the field of Internet, about the copyright property at home and abroad triggered a fierce controversy. Is the root causes of the dispute, between behavior and works to provide Internet service provider behavior boundaries exist ambiguity. This paper attempts to link with the concept frame of the current law. Under the framed link attribute, framed link infringement are discussed, analysis of comprehensive use of theory, case analysis and comparative analysis method, analyzing the above problems, and put forward the frame improvement of link system design. The structure of this paper can be summarized as follows: the first chapter is to define the concept of the box link from. Technical point of clarification framed link and the common link, the difference between the deep links, and the frame form links are summarized, laying the foundation for the subsequent conceptual discussion. At the same time, emphatically analyzes the positive influence and use frame link technology brought to Internet users, and the copyright owner, chain website, genuine market brings negative influence of Internet. The second chapter is to explore the qualitative framed link. To analyze the legislative and judicial present on the framed link in this chapter is mainly based on the the angle of positive law. First of all, starting from the legislative and judicial interpretation, and the combination of the judge interpretation of the law and the judicial interpretation of the limits of our works provide behavior and network service behavior, in order to define our current frame link and is classified as the nature; then, through the analysis of a large number of judicial the case, in practice the court frame link property how qualitative and judicial practice problems on; finally, through the United States, Australia, relevant legislation and case analysis in countries such as germany, To summarize the similarities and differences between China and the nature of the link frame. The third chapter is the problems of infringement of the link frame and discussed. Because the theoretical research of Internet Infringement in China is relatively abundant, so this paper combined with the theoretical foundation, the direct link to specific problems appearing in the frame are discussed. The problems including keyword search and directional search difference of the duty of care in the infringement, infringement and infringement of the cooperative link hotlinking and destruction of technical measures. The fourth chapter is a reflection of China's framed link system. This chapter through the combination of China's current Internet market movements of the framed link system rethinking in this regard, and put forward the further improvement.

【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.4

【参考文献】