流押条款法律效力辨--兼及法律父爱主义立法思想之取舍

发布时间：2018-02-23 22:25

本文关键词： 流押条款效力抵押权法律父爱主义　出处：兼及法律父爱主义立法思想之取舍　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在大陆法系主要国家,法律对流押条款通常采禁止态度,其立法理由包括:流押条款损害抵押人以及抵押人的其他债权人的利益;流押条款违背抵押权的物权属性。其实,这些理由都经不起推敲。允许流押条款不仅契合私法自治的民法理念,而且有利于降低抵押权的实行成本,在客观上起到促进融资、增加担保交易激励的作用。禁止流押条款的法律规制模式是法律父爱主义指导思想在民事立法中的反映,与民法的私法自治理念不相契合,扼杀了流押条款应有的制度功能。我国未来立法应抛弃法律父爱主义立法思想对流押条款制度安排的影响,改采允许主义立法模式,并通过合同效力规则以及债权人撤销权制度对流押条款进行有效调控,抑制其消极效应,发挥其正面制度功能。
[Abstract]:In the main countries of the continental law system, the legal convection clause usually adopts a prohibited attitude. The legislative reasons include: the flow clause damages the interests of the mortgagor and other creditors of the mortgagor; the live-charge clause violates the property right of the mortgage. These reasons cannot stand scrutiny. Allowing the flow of charges not only conforms to the civil law concept of autonomy in private law, but also helps to reduce the cost of mortgage implementation and objectively promote financing. The mode of legal regulation of prohibition of flow of charges is the reflection of legal patriarchal guiding ideology in civil legislation, which is inconsistent with the idea of autonomy of private law in civil law. The future legislation of our country should abandon the legislative thought of legal paternity and change the legislative mode of permissionism to the influence of institutional arrangement of the charging clause. And through the effective rules of contract and the system of countervailing right of creditor to carry on the effective regulation and control, restrain its negative effect, give play to its positive system function.
【作者单位】：南京审计大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目《动产担保物权一元化立法研究》(13BFX093) 江苏省高校人文社会科学研究项目《动产抵押交易法律制度适用及完善研究》(2016SJB820011)
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】