论追续权之客体

发布时间：2018-02-25 05:00

  本文关键词： 追续权 著作权 客体 作品　出处：《中国版权》2016年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国《著作权法》修改草案新增了追续权条款,但其中并未指明追续权的客体。现有学说多认为追续权的客体为作品的载体,这属于物的范畴,但该观点混淆了作品与作品载体间的关系,有违追续权的理论基础。追续权是对艺术作品"传播性"使用的补偿,追续权的权利与义务所共同指向的对象是作品,而非作品载体。设立追续权基于的是艺术作品在作品载体上的不可复制性和唯一性,追续权的客体应为在载体上具备稀缺性的艺术作品。基于此,在界定追续权客体上,应当排除文字、音乐作品、摄影作品、建筑作品以及实用艺术品。在我国,追续权客体应当限于美术作品。
[Abstract]:The revised draft of the copyright Law of our country has added a new clause on the right of continuation, but it does not specify the object of the right of continuation. The existing theories think that the object of the right of continuation is the carrier of the work, which belongs to the category of things. However, this view confuses the relationship between the work and the carrier of the work, which is contrary to the theoretical basis of the right of continuation, which is the compensation for the use of "dissemination" of the works of art, and the object of the right and duty of the right of continuation is the work. Based on the non-replicability and uniqueness of the art works on the work carrier, the object of the continuation right should be the art work which is rare on the carrier. Based on this, in defining the object of the right of continuation, Words, musical works, photographic works, architectural works and practical works of art should be excluded.
【作者单位】： 华东政法大学;埃克斯-马赛大学;
【基金】：法国埃菲尔政府奖学金项目阶段性成果,项目编号:N°P698971C
【分类号】：D923.41
，

本文编号：1533067