公司法人未经合法决议所为法律行为的效力——我国台湾地区司法实务的实践经验及启发

发布时间：2018-03-01 03:15

本文关键词： 法人决议行为法律行为绝对无效相对无效　出处：《北方法学》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：《民法总则》第85条对营利法人的权力机构、执行机构违反法律或章程作出决议被法院撤销的法律后果作出规定,第170条对法人或非法人组织执行工作任务人员的行为后果进行规定,但对这两条规定的适用进行系统整理,仍存在权力机构或执行机构的决议内容违反法令、决议不成立以及执行人员职务范围外事项所为行为,且相对人善意时无法通过解释得出合理答案的法律漏洞。通过整理我国台湾地区法院和学界对公司法人未经股东会或董事会合法决议所为法律行为是否有效的争议的梳理,并对绝对无效说、相对无效说和无权代理说等不同见解的法理基础和源由作出分析,在此基础上提出利益衡量说。在面对相关案件时,应综合考量法律规定需经董事会决议的规范目的、交易安全、法律关系的安定性等因素,来解释法律行为的效力,确保个案处理的公平正义。
[Abstract]:Article 85 of the General provisions of the Civil Code provides for the legal consequences of a resolution made by the organ of power and enforcement of a profit-making legal person, in violation of the law or articles of association, to be revoked by the court, Article 170 the consequences of the conduct of a legal person or an unincorporated organization performing a work assignment shall be prescribed, but the application of these two provisions shall be systematically arranged, and there shall still be a violation of the decree by the resolution of the authority or executive body, Acts committed by resolutions which are not established and in matters outside the scope of the exercise of the functions of persons, By sorting out the disputes in the Taiwan District Court and academic circles about the validity of legal acts committed by legal persons without a shareholders' meeting or a legal decision of the board of directors, On the basis of analyzing the legal basis and source of different opinions, such as absolute invalidity theory, relative invalidity theory and unauthorized agency theory, the author puts forward the theory of weighing interests. In the face of relevant cases, In order to explain the effectiveness of legal acts and ensure the fairness and justice of individual cases, we should take into account the normative purpose, transaction security, and the stability of legal relations, which are required by the law to be decided by the board of directors.
【作者单位】：台湾地区中正大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】