民法总则设置商法规范的限度及其理论解释

发布时间：2018-03-16 05:16

本文选题：民法总则　切入点：商法独立性　出处：《中国法学》2016年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：如何建构民商法二元结构的统一私法体系,主要存在"民法典+单行商事法"与"民法典+商法通则+单行商事法"两种范式主张。其中前者力主"在民商合一体例下制定民法典总则",这一立法设想可行与否,涉及到民法总则设置商法规范的限度及其模式等问题。无论从构建统一私法体系的形式理性立场,抑或从商事立法体系化的现实主义立场,"民法典+单行商事法"范式都难称最优,"在民商合一体例下制定民法典总则"的范式应受质疑,民法总则制定应该果决放弃民商合一的理想化追求,剥离难以承载的提供商法规范之重任,循"民法典+商法通则+单行商事法"范式构建统一私法体系,藉由实现商事立法的体系化,是符合中国民商事立法现实的理性立法选择。
[Abstract]:How to construct a unified private law system with dual structure of civil and commercial law, There are two main paradigms of "single commercial law of civil code" and "single line commercial law of civil code commercial law", in which the former advocate "making the general principles of civil code under the system of civil and commercial integration", whether this legislative assumption is feasible or not. It involves the limitation and mode of establishing commercial law norms in the general principles of civil law. Whether from the standpoint of formal rationality in the construction of a unified private law system, Or from the realistic standpoint of systematization of commercial legislation, the paradigm of "single commercial law of civil code" is difficult to be said to be optimal, and the paradigm of "making the general principles of civil code under the unified system of civil and commercial affairs" should be questioned. The formulation of the general principles of civil law should give up the ideal pursuit of the unity of civil and commercial affairs, peel off the heavy responsibility of the provider law that is difficult to carry, and construct the system of unified private law according to the paradigm of "single line commercial law of the general principles of civil law and commercial law". It is a rational legislative choice to realize the systematization of commercial legislation in accordance with the reality of Chinese civil and commercial legislation.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学民商经济法学院;
【基金】：中国政法大学校级人文社科项目“民法总则制定中的商事主体立法研究”(项目批准号:15ZFZ82007)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】