注册商标连续三年不使用撤销制度研究

发布时间：2018-03-16 08:12

本文选题：注册商标　切入点：不使用　出处：《华中科技大学》2010年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：注册商标连续三年不使用撤销制度是采取注册主义的大陆法系国家商标法中的一项重要制度。该制度设置的意义在于督促注册商标权人积极使用注册商标,减少注册商标的囤积现象,确保商标的识别机能得到有效的发挥。但是从我国目前情况来看,商标立法上的粗糙使得该制度难以适应自其诞生以来被作为竞争手段频繁加以使用而导致的日益增多的撤销案件的需要。目前,该制度的理论研究在我国尚处于起步阶段,笔者粗略统计发现,对该制度进行专门研究的论文非常有限,并且仅有少数专著或教材对该制度展开探讨。基于此,笔者从近年来应用注册商标连续三年不使用撤销制度的典型案例入手,重点分析注册商标连续三年不使用撤销的构成要件,研究与该制度有关的其他重要问题并提出对策。本文分为三章: 第一章“典型案例及其引发的问题”,介绍“康王”商标连续三年不使用撤销案、“GNC”商标连续三年不使用撤销案、“爱多收ATONIK”商标连续三年不使用撤销案,从学界争议的焦点入手,介绍学者主要观点,确定本文研究重点在于如何界定注册商标连续三年不使用撤销制度中的“商标使用”,以及统一判断注册商标是否使用的标准。第二章“注册商标连续三年不使用撤销的构成要件”,该章为本文重点。全面讨论注册商标不使用、注册商标连续三年不使用、注册商标连续三年不使用无正当理由三大构成要件。结合第一章所述案例,重点讨论无权使用者对注册商标的使用是否属于该制度中的“商标使用”、违反行政法的使用是否属于“商标使用”、商标权人单纯的许可、转让行为是否属于“商标使用”等六大问题。第三章“注册商标连续三年不使用撤销制度中其他问题及对策”,重点讨论责令限期改正是否是撤销的前置程序、法律拟制的注册商标不使用以及举证责任的分配和撤销决定的溯及力三大问题。
[Abstract]:The system of non-use of registered trademark for three consecutive years is an important system in the trademark law of countries with civil law system of registration. The significance of this system is to urge the registered trademark owner to use the registered trademark actively. To reduce the hoarding of registered trademarks and to ensure the effective use of trademark recognition machines. But judging from the current situation in our country, The roughness of trademark legislation makes it difficult for the system to adapt to the need of the increasing number of revocation cases caused by its frequent use as a means of competition since its birth. At present, the theoretical study of the system is still in its infancy in our country. According to the author's rough statistics, only a few monographs or textbooks discuss the system. Based on this, the author starts with the typical cases of applying the system of non-use revocation of registered trademark for three consecutive years in recent years, and focuses on the analysis of the constitutive elements of the non-use of revocation of registered trademark for three consecutive years. This article is divided into three chapters:. The first chapter, "typical cases and the problems caused by them", introduces the cases of "Kangwang" trademark not using revocation for three consecutive years, "GNC" trademark not using revocation for three consecutive years, and "ATONIK" trademark not using revocation for three consecutive years, starting with the focus of academic controversy. This paper focuses on how to define the "use of trademark" in the system of non-use and revocation of registered trademark for three consecutive years, and to unify the standard of judging whether the registered trademark is used or not. Chapter two, "the Constituent elements of Non-Use revocation of registered Trademark for three consecutive years", this chapter is the focus of this article. It is an overall discussion of the non-use of registered trademark and the non-use of registered trademark for three consecutive years. For the third consecutive year, the registered trademark shall not use the three major constituent elements without justifiable reasons. It focuses on whether the use of a registered trademark by the unauthorized user belongs to the "use of a trademark" in the system, whether the use of a violation of administrative law is a "use of a trademark", and whether the trademark owner has a simple license. Whether the act of transfer belongs to the "use of trademark" and other six major issues. Chapter three, "other problems and Countermeasures in the system of revocation of registered Trademark for three consecutive years", focuses on whether or not ordering correction within a specified period is a prior procedure for revocation, There are three problems: the non-use of registered trademark and the distribution of burden of proof and retroactive effect of revocation decision.
【学位授予单位】：华中科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D923.43

【引证文献】