合同项下知识产权有效性争议可仲裁性研究

发布时间：2018-03-16 08:11

本文选题：知识产权　切入点：仲裁　出处：《扬州大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着知识经济、物联网、人工智能、信息物理系统等发展,“工业4.0”的浪潮席卷全世界,我国也提出了“中国制造2025”。知识产权的保护愈加重要。为保障我国形成的“大众创新、万众创业”的局面,必须要保护好权利人的知识产权成果,从而保证他们的积极性。从全球来看,各国逐渐加大对知识产权的宣传和保护力度。知识产权纠纷案件随着时代的发展,其数量和复杂度早已超过以往,而解决机制也趋于多样化。仲裁很早就成为了一种高效、方便的解决纠纷的机制,之前更多是把其作为诉讼的补充而存在。然而时过境迁,当仲裁与知识产权纠纷结合后,也慢慢走过了很多艰难的路程,目前,对于知识产权侵权争议、知识产权合同争议利用仲裁来解决的方式在全世界已经被广泛的认可,然而,对于知识产权有效性争议问题,在各国存有很大分歧。我国可不可以利用仲裁机制解决知识产权有效性争议呢,本文全文主要是从知识产权的专利权角度去分析。因为无论是专利权还是商标权他们的有效性仲裁都发展缓慢,几乎没有,故本文没有对这里的知识产权是专利权还是商标权详细区分,认为意义不大。本文主要有五章组成：第一章导论部分,介绍了当前仲裁运用到知识产权争议领域的概况,介绍了仲裁目前的发展背景,以及知识产权的争议分类。介绍了当前世界范围内通过仲裁解决机制解决知识产权争议中的有效性争议的概况。第二章为问题的提出章,此部分用分别用国内外的两个案例,通过对两个案例不同的解决方式的描述,进而提出了问题：知识产权的有效性争议在我国可不可以仲裁。目前行政前置以及司法诉讼解决知识产权有效性是我国的主要手段,随着知识产权案件越来越多,能不能寻找更多的解决问题的途径来帮助司法分担压力呢。这成为了笔者思考的方向,进而把仲裁作为研究的重点。第三章介绍了选择仲裁的必要性,在诉讼外寻找新路径,而诉讼外机制主要有调节、仲裁等等,而选择仲裁的原因在哪,为什么笔者比较青睐仲裁。在这章里笔者对选择仲裁的原因意义进行了描述。第四章介绍了仲裁可以对知识产权有效性进行仲裁的可行性。是文章的重点,主要从三个方面介绍了可行性,进而依据对仲裁的理解提出了仲裁机制构建与完善机制。第五章结论部分,对利用仲裁机制解决知识产权有效性的特点和意义进行了简单阐述与总结。
[Abstract]:With the development of knowledge economy, Internet of things, artificial intelligence, information physics system and so on, the tide of "industry 4.0" has swept the world, and our country has also put forward "made in China 2025". The protection of intellectual property rights is becoming more and more important. In the case of mass entrepreneurship, we must protect the intellectual property achievements of the right holders and ensure their enthusiasm. From a global point of view, With the development of the times, the number and complexity of intellectual property disputes have already exceeded that of the past, and the settlement mechanisms have also tended to be diversified. Arbitration has long been a kind of high efficiency. The convenient dispute resolution mechanism used to exist more often as a supplement to litigation. However, the times have changed. After arbitration and intellectual property disputes have been combined, they have also slowly gone through a lot of difficult paths. At present, As for intellectual property rights infringement disputes, the way in which intellectual property rights contract disputes are settled by arbitration has been widely recognized around the world. However, the dispute over the validity of intellectual property rights has been widely recognized. There are great differences in various countries. Can China use the arbitration mechanism to resolve disputes over the validity of intellectual property rights? This thesis is mainly analyzed from the angle of patent right of intellectual property right. Because whether it is patent right or trademark right, their effective arbitration develops slowly, almost none. Therefore, this paper does not distinguish whether the intellectual property right here is a patent right or a trademark right in detail, which is considered to be of little significance. This paper mainly consists of five chapters: the first chapter introduces the general situation of arbitration in the field of intellectual property disputes. This paper introduces the current development background of arbitration and the classification of intellectual property disputes. It also introduces the general situation of the validity disputes in intellectual property disputes in the world through the arbitration settlement mechanism. This part uses two cases at home and abroad, through the two different solutions to the case description, Then the question is raised: is it possible to arbitrate the validity of intellectual property in our country. At present, administrative preemption and judicial litigation are the main means to solve the validity of intellectual property in our country, with the increasing number of intellectual property cases, Can we find more ways to solve the problem to help the judicial to share the pressure? this has become the direction of my thinking, and then the focus of the study on arbitration. Chapter three introduces the necessity of choosing arbitration, looking for a new path outside litigation. The external mechanism of litigation mainly includes adjustment, arbitration and so on. What is the reason for choosing arbitration? Why do I prefer arbitration? in this chapter, the author describes the significance of the choice of arbitration. Chapter 4th introduces the feasibility of arbitration on the validity of intellectual property rights. It mainly introduces the feasibility from three aspects, and then puts forward the construction and perfection mechanism of arbitration mechanism according to the understanding of arbitration. This paper briefly expounds and summarizes the characteristics and significance of using arbitration mechanism to solve the validity of intellectual property rights.
【学位授予单位】：扬州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D923.4

【相似文献】