当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 民法论文 >

我国惩罚性赔偿制度在消费者权益保护法中的完善研究

发布时间:2018-03-22 06:16

  本文选题:惩罚性赔偿 切入点:消费者 出处:《昆明理工大学》2015年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:惩罚性赔偿制度产生于英美法系,后来逐渐扩展到其他国家,包括大陆法系国家也运用广泛。惩罚性损害赔偿与补偿性赔偿相比,其赔偿金额更高,补偿性赔偿主要是为了弥补消费者的实际损失,在法理中,补偿性赔偿是填补损失,恢复受害者权利的一种方式。惩罚性赔偿不仅带有填补损害、恢复权利的功能,而且更重要的是惩罚加害方的不法行为,让加害方的违法成本远远高于所得收益。惩罚被告的不法行为而判给原告的一笔赔偿金,能弥补受害者在诉讼过程中所花费的律师费、时间及精力上的付出等间接损失。近二十年来,在涉及产品质量纠纷的消费者维权和索赔中,惩罚性赔偿制度越来越受我国法律界的重视。在我国最早的关于保护消费者权益的法律中,就曾经确立了这一制度。在2014年修订的《消费者权益保护法》55条中将其修改完善,惩罚性赔偿制度的确立体现了对消费者倾斜保护的理念,因这一制度具有惩罚、遏制、吓阻等功能,能有效制裁不法经营者,符合大多数受害者的利益诉求,能发挥其应有作用。本文首先运用历史研究方法系统阐述惩罚性赔偿制度的发展历史,基于法理学的视角,分析总结惩罚性赔偿在消费者保护领域的应用、性质以及功能等;通过对比国外以及其他地区相关立法与我国立法的相同点与不同点,借鉴国外先进的立法经验,弥补我国相关立法的不足;从我国惩罚性赔偿的适用条件、概念定义、赔偿标准、完善赔偿机制与监督机制等五个方面提出自己的建议,以求对完善相关立法,并对惩罚性制度适用提出可行性的制度设计,为保护消费者合法权益贡献自己的一份力量。
[Abstract]:Punitive damages came into being in Anglo-American law system, and gradually extended to other countries, including civil law countries. Punitive damages are higher than compensatory damages. Compensatory compensation is mainly to make up for the actual loss of consumers. In legal theory, compensatory compensation is a way to compensate for the loss and restore the rights of the victims. Moreover, what is more important is to punish the wrongdoing of the offending party, so that the illegal cost of the offending party is far higher than the gain. A sum of compensation awarded to the plaintiff by punishing the defendant for the illegal act can make up for the lawyer's fee spent by the victim in the course of the lawsuit. Indirect loss of time and effort. In the past 20 years, in consumer rights and claims involving product quality disputes, The punitive damages system has been paid more and more attention by the legal profession of our country. In our country's earliest law on protecting the rights and interests of consumers, this system was established. It was amended and perfected in Article 55 of the Consumer Rights and interests Protection Law, which was amended in 2014. The establishment of punitive damages system reflects the idea of preferential protection to consumers, because this system has the functions of punishment, containment and deterring, and can effectively sanction illegal operators, which is in line with the interests of most victims. Firstly, this paper uses the historical research method to systematically explain the development history of punitive damages system, based on the perspective of jurisprudence, analyzes and summarizes the application, nature and function of punitive damages in the field of consumer protection. By comparing the similarities and differences between the relevant legislation of foreign countries and other regions and the legislation of our country, we can learn from the advanced legislative experience of foreign countries and make up for the deficiency of the relevant legislation of our country. In order to perfect the relevant legislation and the application of the punitive system, the author puts forward his own suggestions in five aspects, such as the standard of compensation, the perfection of the compensation mechanism and the supervision mechanism. To protect the legitimate rights and interests of consumers to contribute their part of the force.
【学位授予单位】:昆明理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923.8

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前7条

1 赵红梅;;美、德新型惩罚性赔偿对我国《消法》修订的启示[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2011年05期

2 刘俊海;徐海燕;;我国惩罚性赔偿制度的解释与创新[J];法律适用;2013年10期

3 杨立新;“王海现象”的民法思考──论消费者权益保护中的惩罚性赔偿金[J];河北法学;1997年05期

4 崔明峰,欧山;英美法上惩罚性赔偿制度研究[J];河北法学;2000年03期

5 钱玉文;刘永宝;;消费者权益保护中的政府责任解读——基于风险社会的视角[J];常州大学学报(社会科学版);2010年04期

6 艾尔肯;张榆;;论《食品安全法》中的惩罚性赔偿制度——兼评《食品安全法》第96条[J];辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版);2011年05期

7 徐生成;;对双倍赔偿制度的思考——从《消费者权益保护法修正案(草案)》的角度[J];金田;2013年07期



本文编号:1647422

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1647422.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户99a62***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com