商事习惯的优先适用条款加入民法典的法经济学分析

发布时间：2018-03-27 08:16

本文选题：民法典编纂　切入点：民法分则　出处：《社会科学家》2017年06期

【摘要】：相较于《民法通则》,《民法总则》的一大进步在于明确将"习惯"作为正式的法律渊源,但仍存在两个问题有待后续民法典分则各编制定过程中予以考虑。其一是对商事习惯和民事习惯未加区分,其二是没有赋予商事习惯以优先适用于民事基本法的地位。此种设计存在三个弊病:一是忽视了民商事审判、仲裁和法律适用对于改变《合同法》按照具体情况来确定交易习惯适用与否的制度需求;二是增加了交易成本,未能充分实现制度效率;三是不利于有效推进法治经济建设。故而有必要从法律解释学、法律经济学分析两个视角加以阐述商事习惯优先适用条款加入民法典的必要性及具体途径,以服务于民法典后续编纂、民商事法律制度完善以及法治经济的实现。
[Abstract]:Compared with the General principles of Civil Law, one of the major advances in the General principles of Civil Law is the explicit use of "custom" as a formal source of law. However, there are still two problems to be taken into account in the formulation of the Civil Code. One is that there is no distinction between commercial custom and civil custom. The other is that the commercial custom has not been given priority to the civil basic law. There are three disadvantages in this design: first, the civil and commercial trial is ignored. Arbitration and the application of law to change the "contract Law" according to the specific circumstances to determine the applicability of trading habits, the second is to increase transaction costs, not fully realize the efficiency of the system; The third is not conducive to the effective promotion of the economic construction of the rule of law. Therefore, it is necessary to expound the necessity and specific ways of entering the Civil Code from the perspectives of legal hermeneutics and legal economics analysis. In order to serve the subsequent compilation of the Civil Code, civil and commercial law system and the realization of the rule of law economy.
【作者单位】：中山大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923;D923.99

【相似文献】