论不动产冒名处分行为的私法效力

发布时间：2018-03-30 08:23

本文选题：冒名处分　切入点：不动产　出处：《安徽财经大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着社会的发展,生活节奏的加快,法律因其本身相对稳定的特征在对社会活动调节方面存在一定的滞后性。不动产冒名处分行为在现实生活中屡有发生,而在我国现有法律中并没有对其明确的法律规范。对此学界的不同学说争议较大,主要集中在:适用善意取得制度、无权代理制度、表见代理制度等几方面;在司法实践中同案不同判的现象比比皆是,仅靠法官自己对法律规范的理解而进行司法活动是远远不够的。不动产冒名处分行为构成较为复杂,不能笼统的对其进行处理,应当根据该行为的具体情形进行区分对待。笔者认为部分学者强调的直接适用善意取得制度和代理制度并不可行,其构成要件、理论基础和适用前提均有不同。本文通过对不动产冒名处分处分行为内涵及性质的分析,考察国内外不同国家和地区的观点和案例,结合它所带来的社会影响和价值衡量等方面并进行讨论,最终认为不动产冒名处分行为可在适当情况下类推适用表见代理制度,在权衡各方利益的同时维护交易安全,促进社会经济的发展。也希望通过本文的讨论分析能够给司法审判活动带来有效的建议。
[Abstract]:With the development of society, to accelerate the pace of life, the law itself is relatively stable due to its characteristics in the social activity regulation has a certain lag. Real estate false punishment behavior in real life has occurred frequently, and in our existing laws and the clear legal norms. Different theories of controversy in academic circles, mainly focus on the bona fide acquisition, unauthorized agency system, several aspects of the apparent agency system; meet the eye everywhere in the judicial practice of different co contracting phenomenon, only the judge on the understanding of legal norms and judicial activities is not enough. The real estate false punishment behavior constitute a more complex can not generally carries on the processing, should be treated according to the specific circumstances of the act. The author thinks that some scholars emphasize the direct application of goodwill gain system and the agent system is not Feasible, its elements, both theoretical basis and precondition of different. Based on the analysis of real estate by the connotation and the nature of the disposition of punishment, perspectives and cases in various countries and regions of the study at home and abroad, combining the social influence and value etc. it brings and discussed, finally think of real estate false action can be appropriate in analogy for Apparent Agency, maintaining the safety of transactions in the balance of interests of all parties at the same time, to promote social and economic development. Also hope that this paper can bring the dynamic analysis of effective proposals to the judicial work.

【学位授予单位】：安徽财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】