缔约过失责任损害赔偿范围厘定研究

发布时间：2018-03-30 11:27

本文选题：缔约过失责任　切入点：损害赔偿范围　出处：《重庆大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：缔约过失责任制度是我国民事责任形式制度的重要一部分,但在我国,缔约过失责任的含义是什么,何种权利适用缔约过失责任,以及各类型权利适用缔约过失责任的损害赔偿范围如何厘定,这些都是需要解决的难题。本文以此为研究对象,具体讨论我国缔约过失责任之损害赔偿范围的厘定。本文首先介绍了缔约过失责任损害赔偿范围的一般理论,其中包括缔约过失责任的概念、构成要件及损害赔偿范围的基础问题研究。在尊重四要件构成基础上,认为缔约过失责任是指当事人一方在合同接触或磋商之时,二者之间产生了以信赖关系为基础的法定债务关系,而一方未尽诚实、保护等义务,从而使得原合同目的无法实现,缔约过失方应当赔偿相对方因此所产生损害的责任。其次,本文探讨了缔约过失责任损害赔偿范围的具体厘定规则,这是本文的核心问题,也是构成文章之主体部分。笔者得出,无论是信赖利益亦是固有利益都须纳入缔约过失责任保护范畴,其中信赖利益是所受损害与所失利益之和,固有利益则包括人身权益、有形财产利益及无形财产利益。损害赔偿范围较广,亦须进行相关限制。在遵循过失相抵、损益相抵等原则的基础上,一般认为信赖利益的赔偿应以履行利益为限,但针对侵权型缔约过失行为造成的损失及人身损害,要以弥补实际损失为例外。最后,本文在总结我国立法及司法实务存在问题的基础上,提出了笔者自己对缔约过失责任损害赔偿范围厘定的具体建议。
[Abstract]:The system of fault liability in contracting is an important part of the formal system of civil liability in our country, but in our country, what is the meaning of the liability for fault in contracting and what rights are applicable to the liability for negligence in contracting? And how to determine the scope of compensation for damages in the application of various types of rights to the liability for fault in contracting is a difficult problem to be solved. This paper first introduces the general theory of the scope of compensation for damages in contracting fault liability, including the concept of fault liability in contracting treaties. On the basis of respecting the formation of the four elements, the author holds that the liability for fault in concluding a treaty refers to the time when one of the parties contacts or negotiates the contract, There is a legal debt relationship based on trust relationship between the two parties, and one party fails to fulfill the obligations of honesty and protection, which makes the original purpose of the contract impossible to be realized, and the contracting party is liable for the damage caused by the other party. This paper discusses the specific rules for determining the scope of compensation for damages caused by fault liability in contracting, which is the core issue of this paper and also constitutes the main part of the article. Whether it is trust interest or inherent interest, it should be included in the scope of protection of fault liability in treaty, in which trust interest is the sum of the damage and the lost interest, and inherent interest includes the personal rights and interests, Tangible property interests and intangible property interests. The scope of compensation for damages is relatively wide, and relevant restrictions should be imposed. On the basis of following the principles of offset of negligence and profit and loss, it is generally believed that compensation for trust interests should be limited to the interests of performance. However, for the loss and personal injury caused by tort contracting negligence, we should make up for the actual loss as an exception. Finally, this paper summarizes the existing problems in legislation and judicial practice in our country. The author puts forward some concrete suggestions to determine the scope of compensation for damages caused by fault liability in contracting.
【学位授予单位】：重庆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】