论医疗美容损害责任

发布时间：2018-03-30 17:47

本文选题：医疗美容　切入点：传统医疗　出处：《苏州大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：实践中,因医疗美容而导致的损害赔偿纠纷往往被归类为一般的医疗损害纠纷,而忽略了医疗美容自身的特殊性。医疗美容与传统医疗之间都以医疗为介质,两者之间有联系点,但是,双方的相异点更加值得关注。一味地把医疗美容损害归类于一般的医疗损害,不仅不利于医疗美容行业的发展,更重要的是不利于保护接受医疗美容者的权益。本文立足于医疗美容与传统医疗的相异点,从我国大陆地区法律适用方面着手,结合法院实际案例,分析当今医疗美容救济体系的不足,同时,通过比较法研究,借鉴其他国家和地区先进理念,试图对我国医疗美容损害责任作一些新的分析与理解。
[Abstract]:In practice, compensation disputes caused by medical beauty are often classified as general medical injury disputes, but the particularity of medical beauty itself is ignored. Medical treatment is the medium between medical beauty and traditional medical treatment. There is a link between the two, but the differences between the two sides are more worthy of attention. Blindly classifying medical beauty damage to general medical damage is not only detrimental to the development of the medical and beauty industry. What is more important is that it is not conducive to the protection of the rights and interests of those who receive medical beauty. Based on the differences between medical beauty and traditional medical care, this paper begins with the application of law in mainland China and combines the actual court cases. This paper analyzes the deficiency of medical beauty relief system at present, and tries to make some new analysis and understanding of medical beauty damage liability in our country by means of comparative study and drawing lessons from the advanced concepts of other countries and regions.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923

【参考文献】