损益相抵规则的困境与出路

发布时间：2018-04-11 19:02

本文选题：损益相抵 + 完全赔偿　；参考：《齐鲁学刊》2017年03期

【摘要】：司法实践中,对于损益相抵规则的理解不同,出发点不一,在法律适用上呈现散乱甚至冲突状态。其原因在于有的是根据完全赔偿理论,有的是根据惩罚预防说作为损益相抵规则的依据,其虽然得到一定程度的承认,但都缺乏完整统一性,不能体现私法关系当事人之间联系的直接性。损益相抵不在于是否足额赔偿或惩罚赔偿,核心在于是否符合矫正正义下的损害赔偿基本原理以及受害人收到的利益是否是侵权人矫正自己不公行为。
[Abstract]:In judicial practice, for different rule understanding, the starting point is not a present, scattered and even conflict state in the application of the law. The reason is that some are based on full compensation theory, some punishment according to the rule of prevention as the basis, although it is recognized to a certain extent, but the lack of integrity that does not reflect the direct link between private parties. The profit and loss balance is not in full compensation or punitive damages, the core is whether it is in accordance with the corrective justice damages under the basic principle and the interests of the victims received is the infringer to correct his injustice.

【作者单位】：南京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】