不当得利返还请求权问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-17 18:16

本文选题：不当得利 + 返还请求权　；参考：《广东财经大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文针对不当得利制度的核心——不当得利返还请求权,运用多种研究方法,以不当得利返还请求权的构成为主要研究对象,围绕由来、学说和类型等问题,以比较法的视野,综合审视各国立法和司法,提出我国现行法存在的过于概括、缺失可操作性等问题,进行系统的分析整理。论文除去前言和后记,共分为三大部分。第一部分,是对不当得利返还请求权的理论概述。简要介绍了不当得利返还请求权的由来、相关学说,其后再分析不当得利返还请求权的类型,指出给付型与非给付型、原生型与准用型不当得利返还请求权。第二部分,是对不当得利返还请求权构成的新理解,拟从以下四个方面进行论述:第一,不当的内容,涉及非有因取得、非对价取得和非其他正当取得,注重对比大陆法系的无因性理论及英美法系的对价理论,并列出了不当得利返还请求权的排除情形。第二,利的范围,按系统化分类将利分为财产性权利、权益等三种。第三,损失的范围,主要从积极和消极利益损失两个方面进行阐述。第四,得利益与受损失之间的因果关系,主要列举了直接因果关系、非直接因果关系两种不同的观点。这一部分是本文的重点也是难点,细化并运用新的视角重新解读不当得利返还请求权构成的四要件。在这部分加以适当的例子辅助说明。第三部分,主要指出我国现存不当得利返还请求权制度存在的不足之处,并在此基础上提出一些完善建议和相关设想。
[Abstract]:Aiming at the core of the unjust enrichment system-the right to return the unjust enrichment, this paper uses various research methods, taking the constitution of the claim for improper enrichment as the main object of study, focusing on the origin, theory and type of issues, and taking the perspective of comparative law.This paper comprehensively examines the legislation and judicature of various countries, and points out that the existing laws of our country are too general and lack of maneuverability, so as to make a systematic analysis and arrangement.Apart from preface and postscript, the thesis is divided into three parts.The first part is a theoretical summary of the right of unjust enrichment.This paper briefly introduces the origin and relevant theories of the right of return of improper enrichment, and then analyzes the types of the right of return of improper enrichment, and points out that the right of return of unjust enrichment is of payment type and non-payment type, primary type and quasi-type.The second part is a new understanding of the constitution of the right of unjust enrichment return, which is discussed from the following four aspects: first, improper content, involving non-cause acquisition, non-consideration acquisition and other legitimate acquisition,The author contrasts the theory of causality in civil law system and the theory of consideration in common law system, and lists the exclusions of claim for improper enrichment.Second, the scope of interest, according to the systematic classification of interest into property rights, rights and interests.Third, the scope of loss, mainly from the positive and negative interest loss two aspects.Fourth, the causality between benefit and loss, mainly enumerates two different viewpoints: direct causality and indirect causality.This part is the focus of this paper is also difficult, refine and use a new perspective to reinterpret the four elements of unjust enrichment return claims.Give appropriate examples in this section to assist the explanation.In the third part, the author points out the shortcomings of the existing system of the right of claim for unjust enrichment in our country, and puts forward some suggestions and relevant ideas on this basis.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】