论意定代理权的授予行为

发布时间：2018-04-24 05:21

本文选题：意定代理权 + 授权行为　；参考：《比较法研究》2017年02期

【摘要】：代理权系整个代理关系的基础,而代理人所享有的代理权,其发生原因则因法定代理与意定代理而有差异。法定代理系依法律的规定而发生,意定代理则系透过本人(被代理人)的授权行为而取得。基于本人(被代理人)的意思授予代理权的意定代理,主要是依委托、雇用、承揽、承包及合伙等基础关系授予代理权。意定代理权授予行为的性质、方式、范围、内容、认定、瑕疵及其效力,我国现行立法未予明确或虽有关涉但未尽清晰,应依当代比较代理法的共通法理与实证经验而予厘清、厘定及释明。对意定代理权授予行为的无因性(抽象性)于法制史上的肇源与演进的分析,尤其是对有因说与无因说的优缺点的严谨、细致的考量表明,对于意定代理权的授予与其所由授予的基础关系于效力上的关联,我国应采独立性、无因性(抽象性)。意定代理权授予行为的无因性(抽象性)肇源于德国民法,我国不认可德国私法中统一的无因性制度系统,而仅认可其中的代理权授予行为的无因性及商法中票据行为的无因性,是适宜的、妥洽的。
[Abstract]:The power of agency is the basis of the whole agency relationship, and the reason of the agent's power of attorney is different from that of the authorized agency. A statutory agency occurs in accordance with the law, and an authorized agency is obtained through an authorized act by me (the principal). A discretionary agency that grants agency authority on the basis of my own (the principal's) intention to delegate, hire, contract, contract, and partner. The nature, mode, scope, content, determination, defects and their effects of the act of conferring the power of agency are not clear or relevant but not clear in our current legislation, and should be clarified according to the common jurisprudence and empirical experience of contemporary comparative agency law. Determination and interpretation. The analysis of the causality (abstraction) of the act of conferring discretionary agency power in the history of law, especially the rigorous and careful consideration of the merits and demerits of the theory of reason and reason, shows that, As to the relationship between the grant of discretionary agency and the basis by which it is granted, our country should adopt independence and non-cause (abstract nature). The uncausality (abstraction) of the act of conferring the power of agency originates from the German civil law, and our country does not recognize the unified system of uncausality in German private law. However, it is appropriate and appropriate to recognize only the non-causality of the act of granting agency power and the non-causality of the act of negotiable instrument in commercial law.
【作者单位】：中央财经大学法学院;
【分类号】：D913

【相似文献】