游戏网络直播画面的著作权研究

发布时间：2018-05-13 10:24

本文选题：直播画面 + 作品　；参考：《江西财经大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着网络直播技术的兴起,游戏玩家只要身边有一台计算机就可以切换身份,成为一名游戏主播,直播由于其工具的简单化、大众化以及娱乐性逐渐成为了一种文化。法院认定游戏画面本身属于类电影作品,但是又否定了游戏比赛画面作为作品的可能性。法学家们对此也展开讨论,众说纷纭,从不同的角度看,不同的游戏不同水平的玩家,造成游戏操作的画面具有不同的作品属性。深入研究发现,游戏本身留下转换性使用的空间是造成这些不同的核心原因。网易公司用户协议中禁止性条款合理性存在怀疑,对此,游戏高手主播可以合理使用来对抗网易公司不合理条款的规定,普通玩家可以站在公共利益的角度维护自身利益。在著作权法现有的框架内网易公司虽然做法合法但是不合理,著作权法无法解释这个问题,研究计算机软件纳入著作权的历史,发现计算机软件相对于传统文学作品具有“思想表达的缺陷”,直播权最终由游戏开发商和游戏玩家共享。
[Abstract]:With the rise of webcast technology, gamers can switch identities as long as there is a computer around them and become a game anchor. Because of the simplification of its tools, popularity and entertainment, live broadcast has gradually become a kind of culture. The court ruled that the game itself was a film-like work, but denied the possibility of a game screen as a work. Jurists also discuss this, different opinions, from different points of view, different players of different levels of the game, resulting in the game operation screen has different properties of the work. Further study shows that the game itself leaves the space for conversion is the core cause of these different reasons. There are doubts about the reasonableness of prohibitive clause in NetEase user agreement. For this reason, game master anchorman can reasonably use it to counter the stipulation of unreasonable clause of NetEase company, and ordinary player can defend their own interest from the angle of public interest. Within the existing framework of copyright Law, although the practices of NetEase Company are legal but unreasonable, the copyright Law cannot explain this problem, and study the history of the incorporation of computer software into copyright. It is found that computer software has a "defect of thought expression" compared with traditional literary works, and the right to live broadcast is ultimately shared by game developers and gamers.
【学位授予单位】：江西财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】