网络存储空间服务商版权注意义务研究

发布时间：2018-05-25 22:35

本文选题：避风港规则 + 网络存储空间服务商　；参考：《中国政法大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：网络服务商间接侵权制度是平衡网络版权生态的重要法律规则。在这一领域,美国《数字千年版权法案》创设的避风港规则长期居于统治地位。近年来的审判实践表明,避风港规则不合理地降低了网络服务商作为“善良管理人”所应承担的注意义务,损害了网络服务商预防控制用户直接侵权的积极性,导致网络盗版猖獗泛滥。为弥补避风港规则的固有缺陷,我国在司法审判中通过对“知道”和“应当知道”的解释将其部分架空,在行政执法中又要求网络服务商负担起超越立法的审查义务,使得网络版权间接侵权制度变得更加破碎。而网络存储空间由于其特殊的服务性质和极易引发危险的商业模式,更成为版权侵权的“重灾区”。2013年1月1日起生效的《最高人民法院关于审理侵害信息网络传播权民事纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的规定》更设置单独条款,对网络存储空间服务商构成“应知”的情形进行了归纳,足见其矛盾的严重性和紧迫性。是故本文选取网络存储空间服务商的版权间接侵权行为作为主要研究对象。在此基础上,笔者大胆建议,告别网络存储空间服务商避风港规则,回归经典民法和侵权责任法,在必要交易秩序与社会合理期待的基础上,重新确立网络存储空间服务商的合理注意义务,建立以注意义务为核心的版权侵权认定规则。具体的行文安排如下:第一部分,从现实忧虑和制度反思两个角度,分析本文的研究背景。其中“现实忧虑”主要描绘网络存储空间领域版权侵权乱象;“制度反思”重在分析避风港规则的固有缺陷和我国对避风港规则的片面移植。第二部分,研究注意义务的基本理论。首先,重申过错是一般侵权责任的基本构成要件,而判断行为人是否存在过错的标准在于其是否达到了应尽的注意义务;其次,还原基本概念,厘清注意义务的内涵和分类;最后,指出注意义务是变动不居的,在个案中具体判定行为人的注意义务,应遵循可预见性原则、信赖原则和利益最大化原则。第三部分,分析立法成例和司法创新。借鉴各国立法中关于网络存储空间服务商版权注意义务的先进经验;归纳新晋判决中要求网络存储空间服务商自觉承担的典型义务。第四部分,具体构思与设计。重申注意义务之于网络存储空间服务商版权间接侵权制度的重要意义,并设计三个具体的考量维度,为司法审判中如何认定网络存储空间服务商作为“善良管理人”的注意义务提供参考思路。
[Abstract]:The indirect infringement system of network service provider is an important legal rule to balance the network copyright ecology. In this area, the United States Digital Millennium copyright Act created the rule of haven has long dominated. The trial practice in recent years has shown that the rules of safe haven have unreasonably reduced the duty of care that network service providers should bear as "good managers", and damaged the enthusiasm of network service providers to prevent and control users' direct infringement. This has led to rampant piracy on the Internet. In order to make up for the inherent defects of the rules of safe haven, in the judicial trial, the interpretation of "know" and "should know" has been used to partially empty the rules, and in the course of administrative law enforcement, the network service providers are required to bear the obligation to examine beyond the legislation. Make network copyright indirect infringement system becomes more broken. Because of its special service nature and extremely dangerous business model, the network storage space, On January 1, 2013, the provisions of the Supreme people's Court on the application of law to civil disputes infringing upon information network transmission rights have even set up separate clauses. This paper sums up the situation that the network storage space service provider should know, and shows the seriousness and urgency of its contradiction. Therefore, this paper chooses indirect copyright infringement of network storage service provider as the main research object. On this basis, the author boldly proposes to bid farewell to the safe haven rules of the network storage space service provider, to return to the classical civil law and tort liability law, on the basis of the necessary transaction order and the reasonable expectation of the society. This paper reestablishes the reasonable duty of care of the network storage space service provider, and establishes the rules of copyright infringement cognizance based on the duty of care. The specific arrangement is as follows: the first part analyzes the background of this paper from the perspectives of realistic anxiety and institutional reflection. Among them, "realistic worry" mainly depicts copyright infringement disorder in the field of network storage space, and "institutional reflection" focuses on the analysis of the inherent defects of the rules of safe haven and the unilateral transplantation of the rules of safe havens in our country. The second part studies the basic theory of duty of care. First of all, it is reiterated that fault is the basic component of the general tort liability, and the criterion of judging the existence of fault lies in whether it achieves the due duty of care; secondly, it restores the basic concept and clarifies the connotation and classification of the duty of care. Finally, it is pointed out that the duty of care is not subject to change, and the principle of predictability, the principle of trust and the principle of maximization of benefits should be followed in determining the duty of care of the perpetrator in specific cases. The third part, analyzes the legislative example and the judicial innovation. This paper draws lessons from the advanced experience of the copyright obligation of the network storage space service provider in the legislation of various countries, and summarizes the typical obligations which the network storage space service provider is required to undertake consciously in the new judgment. The fourth part, concrete conception and design. Reiterating the importance of the duty of care to the system of indirect copyright infringement by Internet storage service providers, and designing three specific dimensions of consideration, It provides a reference for how to identify the network storage space service provider as the "kind manager" duty of attention in the judicial trial.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】