内容实质性背离的建设工程合同中的效力研究

发布时间：2018-05-26 19:09

本文选题：建设工程合同 + 建设工程合同实质性内容　；参考：《上海交通大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：建设工程合同的变更不同于通常意义上的合同变更,本文结合司法案例中建设工程项目所呈现的实践特点,分析建设工程合同中合同内容实质性背离的实质,在此基础上分析讨论不同情况下的合同效力及认定。文章主要分为三个章节:第一章分析了建设工程合同司法实践中审理情况,总结当前司法实践中的争议点。在此基础上提出本文的讨论主题是建设工程合同内容实质性背离的认定依据以及对白合同内容构成实质性背离的协议的法律效力如何。第二章是建设工程合同内容的实质性背离的适用路径分析。本章分为三节,第一节结合案例分析讨论合同“实质性内容”的范围,主要包括工程价款、工期、工程质量等能够对工程结算产生关键性影响的条款。第二节讨论了如何判定对白合同构成“实质性背离”,区分对合同的细化补充与实质性背离的区别,因工程量增减、设计变更等因素对白合同实质性内容的变更属于非实质性变更,在情势变更下对白合同的实质性背离是合理的。第三章分析了不同类型的建设工程合同对白合同构成实质性背离的法律效力。对于典型的建设工程项目,经过备案的白合同是合法有效的,任何对白合同的实质内容构成实质性背离的协议都是无效的。关于非典型的建设工程项目,自愿进行招投标程序的工程应当适用《招标投标法》,但不以中标合同是否备案作为其是否能作为结算依据的标准。未经招投标的工程项目应当尊重当事人双方的自由意志,体现当事人真实的意思表示且未违反法律法规的强制性规定的合同为有效合同。
[Abstract]:The change of construction project contract is different from the usual contract change. Combining with the practical characteristics of the construction project in the judicial case, this paper analyzes the essence of the substantive deviation of the contract content in the construction project contract. On this basis, the effectiveness of the contract under different circumstances and its determination are discussed. The article is divided into three chapters: the first chapter analyzes the judicial practice of the construction project contract trial, summarizes the current judicial practice of controversy. On this basis, the paper puts forward the discussion topic of this paper is the basis of the substantive deviation of the content of the construction project contract and the legal effect of the agreement which constitutes the substantive deviation from the content of the construction contract. The second chapter is the application path analysis of substantive deviation of construction contract content. This chapter is divided into three sections. The first section discusses the scope of "substantial content" of the contract with case study, mainly including the project price, construction period, project quality and so on, which can have a key impact on the project settlement. The second section discusses how to judge that the contract constitutes "substantial deviation", distinguishing the difference between the detailed supplement and the substantive deviation, because of the increase or decrease of the amount of work. The change of substantive content of white contract is non-material change, and the substantial deviation from white contract is reasonable under circumstance change. The third chapter analyzes the legal effect of different types of construction contracts which constitute substantive deviations from white contracts. For a typical construction project, the white contract after filing is legal and effective, and any agreement which constitutes a substantial deviation from the substantive content of the white contract is invalid. For atypical construction projects, the bidding law should be applied to the projects that voluntarily carry out the bidding procedure, but the criterion of whether the winning contract is put on record as the basis for settlement should not be taken as the criterion. The project without bidding shall respect the free will of both parties, and the contract which reflects the true intention of the parties and does not violate the mandatory provisions of laws and regulations shall be a valid contract.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】