当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 民法论文 >

公众人物隐私权的限制和保护

发布时间:2018-05-28 08:18

  本文选题:公众人物 + 隐私权 ; 参考:《南昌大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:隐私权是现代众多国家中公民普遍享有的一项重要的人格权。以美国为代表的许多国家均对公民的隐私权给予了严格的保护。我国《侵权责任法》虽然将隐私权单独纳入了法律保护的范畴,但我国对隐私权的法律保护体系尚未形成,立法规定不完善、不明确,司法实践中大多以侵犯名誉权、人格权名义来进行保护,这使得很难做到对隐私权的最大程度的保护。 公众人物作为自然人必然也享有隐私权。然而,公众人物又是一个特殊的社会群体,其隐私权与公共利益和公众合理兴趣的冲突不可避免,特别是在当今传媒信息技术日新月异的社会条件下,这种冲突有越来越多,越来越激烈的趋势。因此,如何在对公众人物隐私权进行合理限制的前提下,加强对公众人物隐私权的保护,,成为法学界研究的热点之一。 本文立足于对隐私权的界定和对隐私权与相关理论的研究,通过对公众人物及其隐私权特殊性的分析,以说明公众人物的隐私权应当受到合理的限制和保护。同时基于我国公众人物隐私权限制和保护的法律现状,就进一步完善公众人物隐私权立法提出建议,以期能够对公众人物隐私权保护起到积极作用。
[Abstract]:The right to privacy is an important personality right enjoyed by citizens in many modern countries. Many countries, represented by the United States, have given strict protection to the privacy of their citizens. Although the tort liability law of our country has brought the right of privacy into the scope of the legal protection separately, the legal protection system of the right of privacy has not yet been formed in our country, the legislative provisions are not perfect and clear, and the judicial practice mostly infringes the right of reputation. The right of personality is protected in name, which makes it difficult to protect the right of privacy to the greatest extent. Public figures as natural persons must also enjoy the right to privacy. However, public figures are also a special social group, whose right to privacy conflicts with the public interest and reasonable public interest is inevitable, especially in today's media and information technology changing social conditions, such conflicts have become more and more, A growing trend. Therefore, how to strengthen the protection of the privacy of public figures on the premise of reasonable restrictions on the privacy of public figures has become one of the hot topics in the field of law. Based on the definition of the right to privacy and the study of the privacy and related theories, this paper analyzes the particularity of the public personage and its privacy, in order to explain that the privacy of the public figure should be reasonably restricted and protected. At the same time, based on the current legal situation of the restriction and protection of the privacy of public figures in our country, some suggestions are put forward to further improve the legislation of the privacy of public figures in order to play a positive role in the protection of the privacy of public figures.
【学位授予单位】:南昌大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D923

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前6条

1 毛贺祺;;媒体报道中对公众人物的侵权现象分析[J];今传媒;2013年01期

2 杨立新;关于隐私权及其法律保护的几个问题[J];人民检察;2000年01期

3 曹越;从范志毅败诉看舆论监督中“公众人物”的名誉权问题[J];新闻战线;2003年06期

4 李玉萍;论公诉裁量中的公共利益衡量[J];政法论丛;2005年01期

5 李新天;郑鸣;;论中国公众人物隐私权的构建[J];中国法学;2005年05期

6 何少峰;试论公众人物的隐私权[J];浙江青年专修学院学报;2004年02期



本文编号:1945984

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1945984.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户fb01d***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com