网络聚合类服务提供者责任研究

发布时间：2018-05-31 09:34

本文选题：网络聚合类服务 + 深度链接　；参考：《河北大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：网络聚合类服务近期引起国内大众关注,是被号称“不生产新闻,只做新闻搬运工”的“今日头条”获高额融资后身陷著作权侵权纠纷、后又被国家版权局立案调查并被确认构成侵权限期整改引发的。以我国现在的互联网实践来看,网络聚合类服务包括以“今日头条”为代表的新闻聚合类服务、以“哔哩哔哩弹幕网”为代表的视频聚合类服务、以百度音乐为代表的下载聚合类服务,因其具有类似的行为特征及相同的技术特征,故本文将其一同探讨。网络聚合类服务主要使用的为深度链接技术,我国法律未对其性质作出明确规定,其主要落入《著作权法》的“信息网络传播权”的规制范畴。在实践中,长期存在着对其法律性质的争议,其是否构成侵权,直接侵权还是间接侵权,对其评判适用用户感知标准还是服务器标准,对这些问题都无定论。本文拟由各类聚合类服务来分析网络聚合类服务的行为特征和技术特征,从而对其服务提供者责任进行分析。在其责任分析部分,本文认为,其不存在免责的可能性、侵犯著作权诉讼双方主体适格、其行为具有违法性、具有一定主观过错、对权利人造成一定损害后果、并且损害后果与服务提供者行为具有因果关系,其行为构成侵权;但由其使用链接技术的行为特征,不应认定其为直接侵权。针对以上问题,本文提出了一些《著作权法》方面的立法构想,如实行举证责任倒置、明确“明知”“应知”的判断标准等,以明确网络聚合类服务提供者的行为准则,避免行为失范。在我国现阶段立法对其行为规制不够完善的情况下,可以使用反不正当竞争法的一般性条款进行规制,其对著作权人的行为构成不正当竞争,应承担责任。本文认为,与其盲目竞争,不如加深同著作权人的合作,如建立版权交易平台和集体管理制度等,双方进行利益协调,从而取得共赢。
[Abstract]:The network aggregation service has recently attracted the attention of the domestic public. It is the "headline of Today", which is known as "not producing news, only doing news porters", has been involved in copyright infringement disputes after obtaining high financing. It was later investigated by the National copyright Administration and confirmed to constitute infringement within a time limit. Judging from the current Internet practice in our country, the network aggregation services include the news aggregation services represented by "headlines of Today" and the video aggregation services represented by the "Blee Missile screen Network". Baidu Music as the representative of the download aggregation service, because of its similar behavior and the same technical characteristics, so this paper will discuss it together. The network aggregation type service mainly uses the deep link technology, the law of our country does not make the explicit stipulation to its nature, it mainly falls into the regulation category of "the information network dissemination right" in the copyright Law. In practice, there is a dispute about its legal nature for a long time, whether it constitutes infringement, direct infringement or indirect infringement, the judgment of which is applicable to the standard of user perception or the standard of server, and there is no conclusion on these issues. In this paper, the behavior and technical characteristics of network aggregation services are analyzed, and the responsibility of service providers is analyzed. In the part of its liability analysis, this paper holds that there is no possibility of exemption, the infringement of copyright litigation parties are appropriate, its behavior is illegal, has a certain subjective fault, causing certain damage to the obligee. And the damage consequence has causality relation with the service provider's behavior, its behavior constitutes the infringement, but the behavior characteristic of its using the link technology should not be regarded as the direct infringement. In view of the above problems, this paper puts forward some legislative ideas on copyright Law, such as putting the burden of proof upside down, defining the judgment standard of "knowing" and "should know", and so on, in order to clarify the standards of conduct of network aggregating service providers. Avoid misconduct. Under the condition that the legislation of our country is not perfect at the present stage, the general provisions of anti-unfair competition law can be used to regulate the behavior of copyright owners, which constitutes unfair competition and should bear the responsibility. This paper holds that instead of blindly competing, it is better to deepen cooperation with copyright owners, such as establishing copyright trading platform and collective management system, so as to coordinate the interests of both sides so as to achieve a win-win situation.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】