知识产权海关行政执法权的配置:现状、问题与对策

发布时间：2018-05-31 20:26

本文选题：知识产权 + 海关行政执法权　；参考：《学术交流》2017年01期

【摘要】：目前我国知识产权海关行政执法权权力配置模式属于知识产权海关行政管理职能、行政处罚职能和行政复议职能归属于同一部门的“一元式”权力配置模式。这种权力配置模式不符合相对集中行政处罚权原则,降低了知识产权海关行政执法效率,不利于通过海关行政复议渠道开展行政执法监督。同时知识产权海关行政执法权配置相关配套制度缺失,导致知识产权海关行政裁量权滥用、执法不统一、知识产权海关行政执法发展不均衡等问题。为此应改革知识产权海关行政执法权配置模式,将知识产权海关行政处罚职能与行政管理职能、行政复议职能分离,同时健全知识产权海关行政执法权配置相关配套制度,从而实现知识产权海关行政执法权的整体效能最大化。
[Abstract]:At present, the power allocation mode of intellectual property right customs administration law enforcement power belongs to the intellectual property customs administration management function, and the administrative punishment function and administrative reconsideration function belong to the "univariate" power allocation mode of the same department. This mode of power allocation does not accord with the principle of relatively centralized administrative punishment power, reduces the efficiency of administrative enforcement of intellectual property rights, and is not conducive to carrying out administrative law enforcement supervision through the channel of customs administrative reconsideration. At the same time, the lack of relevant supporting system for the allocation of administrative enforcement power of intellectual property customs leads to the abuse of administrative discretion of intellectual property customs, the disunity of enforcement of law, the unbalanced development of administrative enforcement of intellectual property rights and so on. Therefore, we should reform the allocation mode of intellectual property customs administrative law enforcement power, separate the intellectual property customs administrative punishment function from administrative management function and administrative reconsideration function, and improve the relevant supporting system of intellectual property customs administrative law enforcement power allocation. In order to achieve the intellectual property customs administrative law enforcement power of the overall efficiency maximization.
【作者单位】：黑龙江大学法学院;
【分类号】：DF312

【相似文献】