体育赛事相关著作权问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-31 15:04

本文选题：体育赛事 + 体育赛事节目　；参考：《河北大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来,伴随着我国体育产业的蓬勃发展,体育赛事相关著作权问题正越来越多地引起人们的关注。在司法实践中,体育赛事相关的著作权争议主要集中于体育赛事、体育赛事节目是不是著作权保护的对象,赛事转播权是否属于著作权、网络环境下赛事转播权利的性质如何判定等。体育赛事从举办到节目录制,再到节目传播的整个过程中,赛事本身和节目的性质判定是体育赛事相关著作权问题研究的基础。体育赛事的性质存在作品说和非作品说之争。一般来说,体育赛事包括两大类,其中竞技类赛事不是作品,而艺术表演类体育赛事则具有作品的属性;体育赛事节目的性质存在制品说和作品说之争,争议的分歧源于独创性认定标准的不同。建议按照视听作品保护体育赛事节目。体育赛事从举办到节目传播,其间涉及到多种不同性质的权利。首先,关于赛事组织者对赛事拥有的转播权的性质,业界与学界尚无定论,大体上可以分为物权说和契约权利说。这种权利可以被视为一种具有物权权利特征的契约权。无论如何,这种转播权不是著作权的范围。赛事参与者即运动员能否像表演者一样对赛事享有表演者权,存有争议。比较而言,艺术性体育赛事可被视为作品,运动员可享有表演者权。在我国现行著作权法律框架下,赛事节目如果具有足够的独创性,可以被视为作品,节目制作者可以作为作者对此享有著作权;反之,如果节目缺乏足够的独创性,则节目制作者只能对其享有一种邻接权,即录制者权。在网络环境下,不同的主体可就赛事节目的在线传播依法享有不同的权利。在我国著作权法未来的修改中,一旦节目被视为视听作品,则其制作者将享有著作权。而对于赛事节目各种形式的在线传播,建议对广播权做扩大解释,并将各种形式的网络传播纳入其中。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the vigorous development of China's sports industry, the issue of sports events related copyright is attracting more and more attention. In judicial practice, the dispute about the copyright of sports events is mainly focused on sports events, whether sports events programs are the object of copyright protection, whether the broadcasting rights of events belong to copyright, How to judge the nature of relay rights in network environment. In the whole process of sports events from holding to recording and then to the dissemination of programs, the determination of the nature of the event itself and the program is the basis of the research on the copyright issues related to sports events. The nature of sports events has a dispute between works theory and non-works theory. Generally speaking, there are two major categories of sports events, in which competitive events are not works, while sports events of artistic performance have the attributes of works. The controversy stems from differences in standards of originality. It is suggested that sports programs should be protected according to audio-visual works. Sports events involve a variety of rights from the holding to the dissemination of programs. First of all, there is no conclusion on the nature of the broadcasting rights of the event organizers, which can be divided into the theory of real right and the theory of contractual rights. This right can be regarded as a contractual right with the characteristics of real right. In any case, this broadcasting right is not the scope of copyright. There is controversy about whether athletes can enjoy the right to perform in the same way as performers. In contrast, artistic sporting events can be regarded as works and athletes enjoy the right to perform. Under the current copyright law framework of our country, if the competition program has enough originality, it can be regarded as the work, and the program producer can enjoy the copyright as the author; on the other hand, if the program lacks enough originality, The program producer can only enjoy a neighboring right, that is, the rights of the producers. In the network environment, different subjects can enjoy different rights on the online dissemination of tournament programs. In the future revision of copyright law, once the program is regarded as an audiovisual work, the producer will enjoy the copyright. For all forms of online dissemination of tournament programs, it is suggested to expand the interpretation of broadcast rights and include various forms of online communication.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.41

【相似文献】