视频聚合平台侵权问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-01 05:40

本文选题：视频聚合平台 + 信息网络传播权　；参考：《河北大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：云存储技术的发展,大数据时代的到来,出现了诸如信息网络存储平台、聚合平台等新的网络传播渠道,使得网络作品的使用以及传播路径均发生了极其重大的变化。版权权利人、网络服务商和公众用户之间的利益被打破了平衡,网络服务商是否承担责任,承担什么责任,成为摆在立法和司法机关面前的难题。网络链接技术是网络的核心,无链接无网络。聚合技术在网络链接的基础上应运而生。聚合平台以深度链接技术为手段将相近的内容聚集在一起,在自己的平台上展现给网络用户,一方面给用户带来方便、快捷的网络体验,另一方面侵害了著作权人或相关权利人的合法权益。在理论界有观点认为深度链接与一般链接一样,只是把网页链接在一起的通路,深度链接不是信息网络传播行为,不侵犯信息网络传播权。亦有观点认为深度链接作为技术手段不存在侵权与否,但是聚合平台未经权利人授权或者许可,以自己营利为目的,利用深度链接技术擅自抓取权利人平台上的作品资源呈现给用户的行为,涉嫌侵犯信息网络传播权。由于现行法律规定并不清晰,在司法实务中出现了大量有争议的案件。本文以视频聚合平台作为研究对象,运用对比的方法对聚合与链接进行了区分;运用分类的方法确定了视频聚合平台内容提供者的属性,通过理论与案例结合对信息网络传播权侵权归责理论争议问题予以评析;运用一般侵权原理论述了视频聚合平台的侵权实质;通过评析服务器标准下的司法难题,并对比分析了网页快照、缩略图、视频聚合之间的异同,说明引入实质替代标准的必要性和可能性,并提出视频聚合平台规制法律完善建议,以平衡著作权人、网络服务提供者、网络用户间的利益,促进视频产业健康发展。
[Abstract]:With the development of cloud storage technology and the arrival of big data era, new network communication channels, such as information network storage platform and aggregation platform, have emerged. The interests of copyright owners, network service providers and public users have been disrupted. Whether the network service providers bear the responsibility and what responsibility has become a difficult problem in front of the legislative and judicial organs. Network link technology is the core of network, no link no network. Aggregation technology emerges as the times require on the basis of network link. The aggregation platform takes the technology of deep link as the means to gather the similar content together and show it to the network users on their own platform. On the one hand, it brings users a convenient and quick network experience. On the other hand, it infringes the legitimate rights and interests of copyright owner or relevant right holder. In the theoretical circle, it is believed that the deep link is just the path that links the web page together, and the deep link is not the behavior of information network communication and does not infringe the right of information network communication. There is also the view that there is no infringement of deep links as a technical means, but the aggregation platform is for its own profit without authorization or permission from the right holder. Using the technology of deep link to grab the work resources presented to the user on the platform of the right holder without authorization, it is suspected of infringing on the right of information dissemination on the network. As the current legal provisions are not clear, there are a large number of controversial cases in judicial practice. This paper takes the video aggregation platform as the research object, uses the contrast method to distinguish the aggregation and the link, uses the classification method to determine the attribute of the content provider of the video aggregation platform, Through the combination of theory and case to comment on the information network communication rights infringement liability theory dispute; use the general tort principle to discuss the essence of the infringement of video aggregation platform; through the evaluation of the server standards under the judicial problems, The similarities and differences among web snapshot, thumbnail and video aggregation are compared and analyzed, and the necessity and possibility of introducing substantive substitution standard are explained, and suggestions on how to improve the regulation law of video aggregation platform are put forward in order to balance the copyright owner. Network service providers, the interests of network users, to promote the healthy development of the video industry.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.41

【相似文献】