土地承包权与经营权分离的政策意蕴与法制完善

发布时间：2018-06-01 08:47

本文选题：土地承包经营权 + 土地承包权　；参考：《法学》2015年11期

【摘要】：土地承包权与经营权分离政策的意蕴是,在稳定土地承包经营权的前提下,使实际经营土地者可以获得一种具有物权效力和抵押功能的财产权。该政策事实上是土地承包关系长久不变政策的延伸,体现了农村土地集体所有制的内在要求。现行土地承包经营权流转制度存在权利形态单一、权利效力弱、权利期限短、权利缺乏抵押功能等缺陷,这是两权分离变革得以形成的法制背景。在立法完善方面,可将实际经营土地的权利看作一种在土地承包经营权之上设立的次级土地承包经营权。次级土地承包经营权的名称可通过解释我国《物权法》第125条获得正当性。次级土地承包经营权的期限、抵押以及权利终止时次级土地承包经营权人的土地特别改良费用返还请求权,需要通过完善现行法律规定予以规范。
[Abstract]:The implication of the policy of separating the land contract right from the management right is that under the premise of stabilizing the land contract management right, the actual land operators can obtain a kind of property right with the function of real right and mortgage. The policy is in fact an extension of the permanent policy of land contracting and reflects the inherent requirements of collective land ownership in rural areas. The current circulation system of land contract management right has some defects such as single form of rights, weak effect of rights, short term of rights, lack of mortgage function and so on, which is the legal background of the separation and transformation of the two rights. In the aspect of legislative perfection, the right to actually manage land can be regarded as a kind of secondary land contractual management right established on the basis of land contractual management right. The name of secondary land contractual management right can be justified by explaining Article 125 of Chinese property Law. The time limit of the sub-land contractual management right, the right to claim for special land improvement expenses of the sub-land contractual management owner when the mortgage and the right are terminated, need to be standardized by perfecting the existing legal provisions.
【作者单位】：吉林大学法学院;
【分类号】：D922.32;D923.2

【参考文献】