物权法定缓和的可能性及其边界

发布时间：2018-06-12 17:47

本文选题：物权法定 + 解释　；参考：《比较法研究》2017年01期

【摘要】：我国《物权法》第5条物权法定之"法"的字面含义为法律,而"法律"具有多义性,这为物权法定缓和提供了可能空间;体系解释、沿革解释、比较法解释支持缓和的物权法定,生活需要、交易习惯和类型视角的观察表明严格的物权法定具有不周延性。因此,物权法定可以并且应当作出相对宽松的解释。物权法定之"法"以涵盖行政法规,乃至司法解释为妥。物权法定之"法"不包括习惯法;但法院可根据习惯或者交易需要认定物权性权利,在条件成熟时,可以司法解释加以规定,及时修法更佳。在肯认物权法定应当并可以作出宽松解释的背景下,应严守其缓和的界限,在认定物权性权利的过程中需要考虑事实标准、形式标准、实质标准、必要性标准和排除性标准等五项标准。
[Abstract]:The literal meaning of "Law" stipulated in Article 5 of the Real right Law of China is law, but the "law" is ambiguous, which provides the possible space for the relaxation of property law, system interpretation, historical interpretation, Comparative interpretation supports the easement of property law, life needs, trading habits and types of perspective observation shows that the strict law of property law has a poor ductility. Therefore, the property law can and should make a relatively loose interpretation. The Law of Real right Law covers administrative regulations and even judicial interpretation. The Law of Real right Law does not include customary law, but the court can determine the right of real right according to the custom or the need of transaction. When the condition is ripe, it can be stipulated by judicial interpretation, and the law should be amended in time. Under the background that the law of rem should and can be interpreted leniently, it is necessary to strictly observe the limits of its relaxation, and to consider the standards of fact, form and substance in the process of ascertaining the right of property right. Necessity criteria and exclusionary criteria are five criteria.
【作者单位】：南开大学法学院;
【基金】：天津市哲学社会科学规划课题“物权类型的梳理与思考——类型视域下的物权法研究”(批准号:TJFX11-039) 2015年度中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“法治中国建设的理论与实践问题研究”(63152008)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】