调控政策下商品房买卖合同情事变更原则适用类型化研究

发布时间：2018-06-12 18:08

本文选题：商品房买卖合同 + 情事变更原则　；参考：《浙江大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来,伴随着我国市场经济的快速发展,房地产市场蓬勃发展,住房需求量增大,商品房交易量逐年上升,由此产生的商品房交易领域的合同纠纷也不断增加。国家"限购"、"限贷"、"限价"令的频出,涉房合同纠纷不断涌现,成为社会一大焦点问题。在房产调控政策出台后,往往会由于各种限制性的原因,导致合同不能履行或者不能全部履行。此时,买受人往往以房产限购限贷政策为由要求变更甚至解除合同,但对于房产调控政策是否对其交易产生影响,或是产生了多大的影响,往往不提供丝毫证据予以佐证,从而引起很大的争议。限购限贷等房地产政策在司法实践中不宜简单认定为《合同法》上的不可抗力或者一般意义上的商业风险,因此,合同当事人便拿情事变更作为变更或解除商品房买卖合同的理由。对于情事变更原则在《商品房的解释》和《合同法》中均没有条文规定,仅在《合同法司法解释二》第二十六条对情事变更原则及其合同履行做了较为原则的规定。因此,不论在理论界还是司法实践中,我国对情事变更原则在商品房买卖合同纠纷中的适用均处于保守和回避的态度。法院经常采取调解方式结案的策略。而对于调解不成的案件,由于没有明确的法律依据,法院的判决可谓千差万别。这对于在市场经济日渐活跃,市场形势变化莫测的今天,对保护当事人的合法权益是极为不利和不公平的。本文尝试从实践的角度入手,在情事变更原则的理论分析的基础上,对调控政策影响下商品房买卖合同变更或解除能否适用情事变更原则,如何适用以及适用后的法律后果进行类型化研究,希望能为司法审判提供些许依据,为得到公正的司法裁判结果建立基础。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the rapid development of China's market economy, the real estate market is booming, the demand for housing is increasing, the volume of commercial housing transactions is rising year by year, and the resulting contract disputes in the field of commercial housing transactions are also increasing. The national "limited purchase", "limit loan", "limit price" order frequently appears, the housing contract dispute emerges unceasingly, becomes a social big focal point question. After the introduction of real estate regulation policy, often due to a variety of restrictive reasons, the contract can not be fulfilled or not fully performed. At this time, buyers often ask for the modification or termination of the contract on the grounds of the property purchase and loan restriction policy, but whether or not the property regulation policy has an impact on its transactions, or how much impact it has, is often not supported by any evidence. This caused great controversy. In the judicial practice, the real estate policy, such as limiting purchase and lending, should not be simply recognized as force majeure in contract law or commercial risk in general sense, therefore, Parties to the contract change as a reason for alteration or rescission of commercial housing sales contract. There is no provision for the principle of circumstance change in the interpretation of Commodity Housing and the contract Law, but in Article 26 of the Judicial interpretation of contract Law, the principle of circumstance change and the performance of the contract are stipulated in a more principled way. Therefore, whether in theory or judicial practice, the application of the principle of change of events in commercial housing sales contract disputes are conservative and evasive attitude. Courts often resort to mediation to close the case. But for the case that mediation fails, because there is no clear legal basis, the judgment of the court can be said to be very different. This is extremely disadvantageous and unfair to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties in the increasingly active market economy and unpredictable market situation today. Based on the theoretical analysis of the principle of circumstance change, this paper attempts to apply the principle of change of circumstance to the change or rescission of the contract of sale and purchase of commercial housing under the influence of the policy of regulation and control. In order to provide some basis for judicial trial and to establish the basis for obtaining fair judicial results, how to apply and how to classify the legal consequences after being applied is expected to provide some basis for judicial trial.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.6

【参考文献】