确定FRAND承诺下标准必要专利许可费费率的原则和方法——基于美国法院的几个经典案例

发布时间：2018-06-17 03:56

本文选题：FRAND承诺 + 标准必要专利　；参考：《知识产权》2016年02期

【摘要】：专利许可费是专利权人因为其发明创造而应该得到的充分补偿,但是该补偿应该且仅应该限于覆盖专利发明本身的价值,不能扩展到采用了该专利技术的标准、其他标准或者该专利产品特征之外的其它特征所产生的价值。通过美国法院近年审理的几起涉及FRAND承诺的案例,着重关注美国法院是如何通过确定FRAND承诺下标准必要专利许可费费率来解决许可费的争议问题。这些案例中涉及的几项重要指导原则和方法对于法官、律师和专利许可谈判方今后就确定FRAND许可费及其费率基准具有重要的借鉴和参考价值。这些原则包括但不限于:反对专利劫持和许可费堆叠原则、合理的许可费分析原则、基于比例分配原则以及整体市场价值规则。
[Abstract]:The patent licence fee is the full compensation that the patentee should receive for his invention, but the compensation should and should be limited to covering the value of the patented invention itself and cannot be extended to the standards for the adoption of the patented technology, Value generated by other standards or other features other than the features of the patented product. Based on several cases involving FRAND promise in recent years, this paper focuses on how American courts resolve the dispute of license fee by determining the standard rate of necessary patent license fee under FRAND commitment. Several important guiding principles and methods involved in these cases have important reference value for judges, lawyers and patent license negotiators to determine the FRAND licensing fee and its tariff benchmark in the future. These principles include, but are not limited to: the principle of opposing patent hijacking and stacking of license fees, the principle of reasonable licensing fee analysis, the principle of proportional distribution and the rule of overall market value.
【作者单位】：对外经济贸易大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923.42

【相似文献】