中国知识产权法院民事案件管辖规定检视——以专利纠纷案件为视角

发布时间：2018-06-21 05:19

本文选题：知识产权法院 + 专利案件　；参考：《北京社会科学》2015年09期

【摘要】：专业性案件专业法官专业化审理是知识产权法院设置应有之义。以专利纠纷案件为例,检视中国知识产权法院民事案件管辖规定及实践,发现其更多地体现从应然性视角强调管辖案件范围,而忽视设置知识产权法院目标定位;管辖定位模糊,缺乏解决"三地"知识产权法院与"三地"外普通法院管辖权冲突的明确规则;欠缺具有技术背景知识的法官。完善知识产权法院案件管辖及审理,应限缩管辖案件范围,实行(三地)域内集中管辖与域外优先管辖相结合模式,引入技术调查官制度。并谋求在立法中予以固化,真正实现知识产权法院对专业技术性知识产权案件实现专业化审理。
[Abstract]:The professional trial of professional case judge is the proper meaning of the intellectual property court. Take the case of patent dispute as an example, inspect the jurisdiction regulations and practice of the civil case of the Chinese intellectual property court, find that it emphasizes the jurisdiction of the case from the perspective of the deserved nature, and neglecting the setting of the target orientation of the court of intellectual property rights; and the jurisdiction of the court. There is a lack of clear rules to solve the conflict between the "three places" intellectual property court and the jurisdiction of the ordinary court outside the "three places"; the judges lack the technical background knowledge. To improve the jurisdiction and trial of the case of the intellectual property court, the scope of the jurisdiction should be limited, and the model of the combination of the centralized jurisdiction and the extraterritorial jurisdiction in the three regions and the introduction of the technology are introduced. The system of investigation officials should be solidified in legislation so as to truly realize intellectual property courts' professionalization of professional and technical intellectual property cases.
【作者单位】：南京师范大学法学院;福州大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目(15BFX154)
【分类号】：D923.4

【相似文献】