当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 民法论文 >

“蹭网”行为惩罚性赔偿制度的构建

发布时间:2018-06-22 09:36

  本文选题:“蹭网”行为 + 无线数据网络传播资源 ; 参考:《吉林大学》2015年硕士论文


【摘要】:伴随互联网技术发展的日趋成熟,加之智能设备普遍的市场投入,无线网络已经成为我们日常生活中不可或缺的一部分,如今走进城市的大街小巷,在餐厅、商场这些休闲的公共场所到处可见WIFI的标志。但是当我们在享受这种高速便利的同时,一些不法分子也正在利用无线网络技术手段侵犯他人的合法权益,这种未经他人许可,没有支付合理对价而使用他人合法无线网络信号的行为被我们称为“蹭网”。在世界上,针对“蹭网”而引起的违法犯罪行为,一些无线网络技术发展比较超前的国家已经出台了或惩罚行为人或救济受害人权益的相关法律规范。那么,对于近十年无线网络技术超速发展的中国,“蹭网”这种行为会给我们的生活带来何种影响,在中国建设法治社会的道路上会面对哪些考验,都是我们必然会遇到的问题,而保障一个健全的法治环境,充分保护人们的合法利益,是我们迈向法治社会新时期新发展的前提。 本文对“蹭网”行为日益加剧这一情况进行了深入分析,,运用法理学原理与民法理论相结合的分析方法,以“蹭网”行为的法律本质作为切入点全面剖析“蹭网”行为,通过界定该行为的性质以及归纳该行为的类型,力求更加准确地制定“蹭网”行为的规则,明确责任的承担。“蹭网”行为是一种行为人主观恶意的综合性侵权行为,本文以行为人是否破解WIFI密码为标准,将“蹭网”行为分为无破解WIFI密码和破解WIFI密码两种。“蹭网”行为之所以需要适用惩罚性赔偿责任,是因为该行为造成的损害已经不是表面可见的侵犯受害人无线网络信号使用权而导致的金钱损害,更多的是无法用金钱衡量的无形利益,这种权益的保护和救济是一般侵权损害赔偿制度不能涉及的。所以对于造成这种远远超过实际可见损害的恶意侵权行为,唯有惩罚性赔偿责任方可救济。本文首先把惩罚性赔偿责任与一般损害赔偿责任和刑事责任相对比,论证“蹭网”行为适用惩罚性赔偿制度的优势所在。其次借鉴外国法中对“蹭网”行为侵权责任的法律适用,总结利弊并结合侵权法的原理,解决“蹭网”行为惩罚性赔偿的责任认定问题。最后说明针对“蹭网”行为惩罚性赔偿额计算的问题,我们应该采用设定赔偿金最低限额的限制法官自由权的计算方法,对受害人损失赔偿额具体计算方式进行完善,最终构建“蹭网”行为的惩罚性赔偿制度。这样我们能够从源头上解决“蹭网”这一现象的发生,可以消除网络的安全隐患,通过社会各方的相互配合,已达到保护受害者的合法利益,维护我国电信网络环境秩序良好发展的目的。
[Abstract]:With the growing maturity of Internet technology and the widespread investment in the market for smart devices, wireless networks have become an indispensable part of our daily lives, and now we are walking into the streets of cities, in restaurants, Weii signs can be seen everywhere in casual public places like shopping malls. But while we are enjoying this high speed and convenience, some lawbreakers are also using wireless network technology to violate the legitimate rights and interests of others without the permission of others. The use of other people's legitimate wireless network signals without paying reasonable consideration is referred to as "netting." In the world, some countries that have advanced the development of wireless network technology have issued or punished the relevant legal norms for the rights and interests of the victims. Well, for China, with the rapid development of wireless network technology in the past decade, what kind of impact this behavior will bring to our lives and what kind of tests will we face on the road of building a society ruled by law in China? It is inevitable for us to meet the problems, and to protect a sound legal environment and fully protect the legitimate interests of people is the premise of our new development towards the new era of the society ruled by law. This article has carried on the thorough analysis to the situation which the "scrape net" behavior intensifies day by day, uses the law theory principle and the civil law theory to combine the analysis method, taking the law essence of the "scrape net" behavior as the breakthrough point, comprehensively analyzes the "scrape net" behavior. By defining the nature of the act and summing up the type of the act, the author tries to make the rules of "netting" behavior more accurate and make clear the responsibility. The behavior of "scrubbing net" is a kind of subjective and malicious comprehensive tort. This paper divides the behavior of "scrubbing net" into two kinds: no cracking WiFi password and breaking WiFi password according to whether the perpetrator breaks WiFi password or not. The reason why the "netting" action requires punitive liability is that the damage caused by the act is no longer the apparent pecuniary damage caused by the violation of the right to use the wireless network of the victim. What is more, the intangible benefits which cannot be measured by money, the protection and relief of this kind of rights and interests can not be involved in the general tort damage compensation system. Therefore, punitive liability is the only remedy for malicious tort that causes far more damage than actual visible damage. In this paper, the author compares the punitive damages liability with the general damages liability and criminal liability, and demonstrates the advantages of the "netting" behavior in applying the punitive damages system. Secondly, using the foreign law for reference, the author summarizes the advantages and disadvantages and combines the principles of tort law to solve the problem of liability identification of punitive damages. Finally, in view of the problem of calculating punitive damages for "scouring net" acts, we should adopt the calculation method of limiting the right to freedom of judges by setting the minimum amount of compensation, and perfect the concrete calculation method of the compensation for the victims' losses. Finally, the system of punitive damages should be constructed. In this way, we can solve the problem of "scouring the net" from the source, eliminate the hidden dangers of network security, and through the mutual cooperation of all parties in society, we have achieved the protection of the legitimate interests of the victims. The purpose of maintaining the order of telecom network environment in our country is to develop well.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 王利明;美国惩罚性赔偿制度研究[J];比较法研究;2003年05期

2 王军;王轩;;英国法上的名誉权保护——以诽谤之诉为考察对象[J];法学杂志;2008年02期

3 林旭霞;;论网络运营商与用户之间协议的法律规制[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2012年05期

4 马新彦;黄立嵘;;电信网络运营商强制消费惩罚性赔偿责任的立法论证[J];当代法学;2014年03期

5 蒙晓阳;;论无线网络数据传输资源的法律性质[J];河北法学;2011年01期

6 马新彦;邓冰宁;;论惩罚性赔偿的损害填补功能——以美国侵权法惩罚性赔偿制度为启示的研究[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;2012年03期

7 齐晓琨;;德国民法中的一般人格权[J];吉林省教育学院学报;2006年10期

8

本文编号:2052401


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2052401.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户7dbe8***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com