当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 民法论文 >

涤除权制度探究

发布时间:2018-07-10 19:24

  本文选题:涤除权 + 抵押权 ; 参考:《黑龙江大学》2015年硕士论文


【摘要】:涤除权制度是为规范抵押物转让而设计的以抵押物受让人为主导旨在使受让人取得受让物完整所有权为目的的制度,从该制度起源发展至今被许多国家继承和改良,与早期过分加重抵押权人责任和义务相比修改后的涤除权制度更趋于缓和,有效平衡了抵押权人与抵押物受让人的利益天平。与代价清偿制度相比该制度把消灭抵押权的主动权赋予抵押物受让人,大大增加了抵押权消灭的可能。与替代清偿制度相比又可以避免当抵押物价值低于主债务价值时受让人须支付全部债务额的弊端,极大的促进抵押物的流通。然而我国学者却把《物权法》第191条第2款之但书规定当做涤除权制度,我国不仅没有涤除权制度并且长期以来都强调对抵押权人的保护限制抵押物转让造成了抵押权人与抵押物受让人利益天平的失衡,不利于物的流通违背物尽其用,因此受到学者的强烈质疑与批判。我国在未来的民法典编订中应该回归传统大陆法系即放开对抵押物转让的限制,并赋予抵押权追及效力在此基础上引入涤除权制度以平衡各方当事人的利益。
[Abstract]:The system of purge right is designed to standardize the transfer of mortgagee, which is designed for the purpose of making the transferee obtain the complete ownership of the assignment. From the origin of the system, it has been inherited and improved by many countries. Compared with the early excessive aggravation of the responsibilities and obligations of the mortgagee, the modified system tends to ease, effectively balancing the interests of the mortgagee and the transferee of the mortgagee. Compared with the consideration settlement system, the system assigns the initiative right to the transferee of the mortgagee, which greatly increases the possibility of the elimination of the mortgage. Compared with the alternative liquidation system, the transferee can avoid the drawback that the transferee has to pay the total amount of the debt when the value of the mortgage is lower than the value of the principal debt, which greatly promotes the circulation of the mortgage. However, Chinese scholars regard the proviso of Article 191, paragraph 2, of the "Real right Law" as a system of purging rights. Our country not only does not have the system of purging and removing the right but also emphasizes the protection to the mortgagee for a long time. Therefore, the scholars strongly questioned and criticized. China should return to the traditional civil law system in the future civil law system, that is, to liberalize the restrictions on the transfer of mortgage, and to give the mortgage right to pursue and effect on the basis of introducing the system of purge right in order to balance the interests of the parties concerned.
【学位授予单位】:黑龙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923.2

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前4条

1 陈英;抵押权追及效力浅析——兼谈抵押物受让人的涤除权[J];天津市政法管理干部学院学报;2005年03期

2 张淑莲;蒋子翘;;抵押物转让法律关系研究[J];经济师;2014年06期

3 孙皓;;论我国抵押物转让制度的重构[J];温州大学学报(社会科学版);2013年03期

4 ;[J];;年期

相关重要报纸文章 前2条

1 潘晓璇;抵押物第三取得人行使涤除权的要件[N];人民法院报;2004年

2 记者杨通河;贵州高院终审首例涤除权案[N];法制日报;2005年

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 刘建;涤除权制度探究[D];黑龙江大学;2015年



本文编号:2114428

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2114428.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户8a04a***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com