论善意取得制度中的“善意”

发布时间：2018-07-10 19:11

本文选题：善意取得 + 善意　；参考：《山东大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：善意取得制度是物权法中一项非常重要的制度,在平衡交易中财产动的安全和静的安全这两个法律价值方面发挥了巨大的作用。随着学界对该制度研究的不断深入,善意取得制度已经日趋完善。但美中不足的是我国理论界主要从其客体、是否对价有偿等方面探讨,对于“善意”则较少涉及,笔者认为,善意是善意取得制度中最本质的要素,只有把握好对“善意”的理解和判断标准,才能够更好地在司法实践中理解并运用善意取得制度解决实际问题。本文以“善意”的确定研究为中心,除引言和结论之外,分四个部分展开论证。第一部分,通过对各国学者论著的分析,得到了三种有关善意的学说,简要说明这些学说的起源和特征,然后加以比较,得出不同学说的优势劣势,以及现代各国大都采用的学说和各国学者大都倾向的学说,为下文的逐步分析提供理论依据。第二部分从我国的立法例入手,分别列出了中国大陆和台湾地区关于善意取得制度的立法例,然后梳理出大陆地区学者和台湾地区学者对各自“民法”中善意取得制度中“善意”的观点,包括“善意”的定义,对善意的判定标准等等。继而总结出大陆地区和台湾地区学者的通说和一般观点。第三部分主要对国外的一些关于善意取得制度的立法例进行了综述和分析,主要选取了德国、瑞士、日本、意大利、奥地利的立法例,并通过各国学者对本国立法例的分析进一步理解各国善意取得制度中的“善意”,为我国的立法和司法实践提供借鉴经验。第四部分通过综合前文的分析,笔者总结出了在确认“善意”时应当考虑的因素,可以从善意的主体、善意认定的时间要件、“无过失”是否应该成为认定善意的要件、善意的举证责任、动产和不动产是否应对善意采取不同的认定标准这五个方面进行考虑。本文针对善意取得制度中“善意”要素的有关问题,进行了粗浅的分析,提出了自己不成熟的观点,期望可以从一个不同的角度构建善意取得制度,从而对我国的司法实践有所帮助。
[Abstract]:The system of bona fide acquisition is a very important system in the property law, which plays a great role in balancing the two legal values of the security of property movement and the safety of static property in the transaction. With the deepening of academic research on the system, the system of bona fide acquisition has become more and more perfect. However, what is lacking in the ointment is that the theoretical circle of our country mainly discusses it from the aspects of its object, whether it is paid for consideration or not, but it is less involved in "goodwill". The author believes that goodwill is the most essential element in the system of bona fide acquisition. Only by grasping the understanding and judging standard of "goodwill" can we better understand and use the system of bona fide acquisition to solve practical problems in judicial practice. This paper focuses on the determination of "goodwill", except the introduction and conclusion, it is divided into four parts. In the first part, through the analysis of the works of scholars from various countries, we get three theories about goodwill, explain the origin and characteristics of these theories, and then compare them, and find out the advantages and disadvantages of different theories. The theories adopted by most modern countries and scholars tend to provide theoretical basis for the following analysis step by step. The second part starts with the legislation of our country, and lists the legislation examples of the bona fide acquisition system in mainland China and Taiwan, respectively. Then, the views of mainland scholars and Taiwanese scholars on bona fide acquisition system in their respective Civil Law, including the definition of "bona fide" and the judgment standard of bona fide, are sorted out. Then summed up the mainland and Taiwan region scholars and general views. The third part mainly summarizes and analyzes some foreign legislation cases about bona fide acquisition system, mainly selects Germany, Switzerland, Japan, Italy, Austria legislative example, Through the analysis of domestic legislation cases, scholars in various countries further understand the "goodwill" in the system of bona fide acquisition in various countries, and provide reference experience for our legislative and judicial practice. In the fourth part, the author summarizes the factors that should be considered in the confirmation of "goodwill", including the subject of goodwill, the time element of goodwill determination, and whether "no-fault" should be the element of confirming goodwill. The burden of proof in good faith, whether movable property and immovable property should adopt different standards of recognition in good faith are taken into consideration. This paper makes a brief analysis of the elements of "goodwill" in the system of bona fide acquisition, puts forward its own immature point of view, and expects to construct the system of bona fide acquisition from a different angle. It is helpful to the judicial practice of our country.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.2

【参考文献】