《民法总则》关于“民事法律行为”规定的释评

发布时间：2018-07-12 10:19

本文选题：民法总则 + 法律行为　；参考：《法律适用》2017年09期

【摘要】：《民法总则》"民事法律行为"一章将意思表示概念和理论贯彻始终,构建了基本完整的意思表示规则,纠正了关于民事法律行为"合法性"要件的立法错误。此外,该章通过新设通谋虚伪表示与隐藏行为规则、复合乘人之危和显失公平为暴利行为、增加第三人欺诈、胁迫以及重修违法行为无效规则等,体现了《民法总则》重返传统法律行为制度的姿态。然而,意思表示理论贯彻的不彻底、单方虚伪表示规则的阙如、通谋虚伪表示的对抗效力等瑕疵,表明离完整法律行为理论要求还有明显的体系欠缺;而对于变更权的删除,既是对最新立法趋势的漠视,也体现了对我国既有立法成绩自信心不足的体现。
[Abstract]:In the chapter of "Civil legal acts", the concept and theory of the expression of will are carried out thoroughly, the basic and complete rules of expression of will are constructed, and the legislative errors concerning the elements of "legality" of civil legal acts are corrected. In addition, through new rules of false representation and concealment of acts of conspiracy, the chapter combines taking advantage of others' danger and apparent injustice as an act of profiteering, increasing third party fraud, coercion, and remaking invalid rules of illegal acts, and so on. It reflects the attitude of returning to the traditional legal behavior system. However, the imperfections of the implementation of the theory of expression of will, the lack of rules of unilateral hypocrisy and the antagonistic effect of collusion of hypocrisy indicate that there is a clear lack of system to the requirements of the complete theory of legal behavior, and the deletion of the right to change. It not only ignores the latest legislative trend, but also reflects the lack of confidence in China's existing legislative achievements.
【作者单位】：北京第二外国语学院国际法学院;
【基金】：2012年度国家社会科学基金项目《我国旅游立法重大问题研究》(12BGL069) 国家旅游局2015年度旅游业青年专家培养计划《旅游法基础理论研究与实务应对》(TYETP 201503) 北京市法学会2016年度市级法学研究课题《北京市旅游消费者损害赔偿请求权保护立法问题研究》(BLS(2016)B018)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】