论债权平等原则及其背离
发布时间:2018-07-12 10:10
本文选题:债权平等 + 法定担保 ; 参考:《山东大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:债权具有相容性和平等性,不仅在同一标的物上可以同时并存数个债权,而且数个债权人对同一债务人先后发生数个普通债权时,其效力一律平等,不因其成立先后而有效力上的优劣,是为债权平等原则。债权平等原则是体现民法上的平等原则和债之相对性原则的一项重要具体原则,为债权与物权区分说的基本构成要素之一。但是随着社会经济的发展,为了保护弱势群体和社会公益,实现公平正义,排除债权平等原则的各项制度应运而生。本文将探究债权平等原则产生的源头及其在债法领域乃至整个民法体系中的地位与价值意义,分析与比较破除债权平等原则的不同立法模式,以及在现代经济社会中债权平等原则及背离的理论基础与实践需求;在比较与学习中探寻我国债权平等原则破除的合理模式,以债权平等原则的维护发展与合理破除为视角,探究多重买卖情形下,对债务人履行顺位的合理规制。
[Abstract]:The creditor's rights are compatible and equal, not only can exist several claims simultaneously on the same subject matter, but also have equal effect when several creditors have several ordinary claims against the same debtor successively. It is the principle of equality of creditor's rights that the merits and demerits have no effect because of their establishment. The principle of equal creditor's rights is an important concrete principle which embodies the principle of equality in civil law and the principle of relativity of debt. It is one of the basic constituent elements of the distinction between creditor's rights and real right. However, with the development of social economy, in order to protect the vulnerable groups and social public welfare, to achieve fairness and justice, to exclude the principle of equal creditor's rights emerged as the times require. This article will explore the origin of the principle of equal creditor's rights and its position and value significance in the field of debt law and the whole civil law system, and analyze and compare the different legislative models to break the principle of equality of creditor's rights. And the theoretical basis and practical demand of the principle and deviation of creditor's rights equality in modern economic society, and to explore the reasonable mode to break up the principle of equality of creditor's rights in comparison and study, taking the maintenance and development of the principle of equality of creditor's rights as the angle of view. This paper explores the reasonable regulation of the debtor's performing order under the situation of multiple transactions.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 崔建远;;再论动产物权变动的生效要件[J];法学家;2010年05期
2 陈琳;陈志兴;;论我国民事优先权的立法原则与体系构想——兼论各民事优先权顺位及其协调[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2007年04期
3 戴新毅;;债权平等及其突破模式选择[J];河北法学;2013年06期
4 刘光;优先权制度的历史考证与分析[J];法学论坛;2002年04期
5 韩长印;破产优先权的公共政策基础[J];中国法学;2002年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 代瑞;优先权基本理论研究——以特种债权的优先权为范围展开[D];郑州大学;2004年
2 张利英;建设工程价款优先受偿权法律问题研究[D];西南交通大学;2012年
,本文编号:2116809
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2116809.html