特殊动产物权复原性变动与对抗效力研究

发布时间：2018-07-12 18:13

本文选题：特殊动产 + 物权　；参考：《沈阳师范大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：基于合同无效、撤销或者解除的法律效果,当特殊动产的转让合同由于某种原因被认定为无效、撤销或者解除后,受让方需要将特殊动产的所有权返还给出让方,这种返还原物所有权的过程就是特殊动产物权的复原性变动。如果受让方将该特殊动产再转让给第三人所有时,出让方直接要求受让方返还原物的权利将会受到限制,在出让方与第三人之间便产生取得该特殊动产所有权的对抗关系。《最高人民法院关于审理买卖合同纠纷案件适用法律问题的解释》关于特殊动产一物二卖中标的物交付和所有权转移规则,针对的是两者对该特殊动产都享有债权权利,而特殊动产物权复原性变动过程中的对抗并非只存在于债权之间,因此需要重新进行物权变动及所有权转移的设定。因无效、撤销或者解除所导致的物权复原性变动与对抗的效力会有所不同:特殊动产转让合同无效时的物权复原性变动及对抗规则。导致合同无效的情形有许多,其中最为常见的是因违反效力性强制规定或者公序良俗所导致的无效,由此而导致的物权复原性变动与对抗受许多因素的影响,需要从第三人的确定、基准时间的确定、利益优先维护等作切入点,对变动规则、对抗规则予以设定。特殊动产转让合同被撤销时的物权复原性变动及对抗规则。如同无效一样,导致合同被撤销的情况也很多,基于被撤销的可谴责性情形,将被撤销的原因区分为胁迫导致的撤销和非因胁迫导致的撤销两种。通过出卖人对合同被撤销的可谴责性程度不同,分析出现第三人时取得特殊动产所有权的对抗效力。合同解除情形时的特殊动产物权复原性变动及对抗。合同解除效果是否直接及与第三人对物权的复原性变动与对抗有重要影响,区分合同解除的效力研究特殊动产的物权变动及对抗是有必要的。本文只是对特殊动产物权复原性变动及对抗效力问题做粗浅分析,其规则还需要理论研究和司法实践经验的丰富。
[Abstract]:On the basis of the legal effect of invalidity, revocation or dissolution of the contract, when the contract for the transfer of special movable property is deemed invalid for some reason, the transferee shall return the ownership of the special movable property to the transferor, The process of returning the ownership of the original property is the restorative change of the real right of the special movable property. If the transferee retransfers the special movable property to a third party, the transferee's right directly to require the transferee to return the original property will be restricted, A confrontational relationship arises between the transferor and the third party to acquire the ownership of the special movable property. The interpretation of the Supreme people's Court on the Application of Law in handling disputes over contracts of purchase and Sale Rules for delivery of goods and transfer of title, Both of them have the right of claim on the special movable property, and the confrontation in the process of the reversion of the property right of the special movable property does not exist only between the creditor's rights, so it is necessary to re-establish the change of real right and the transfer of ownership. As a result of invalidity, rescission or rescission, the effect of reversion of real right is different from that of confrontation: when the contract of transfer of special movable property is invalid, the change of reversion of real right and the rules of confrontation. There are many situations that lead to the invalidation of the contract, the most common of which is the invalidity caused by the violation of the mandatory provisions of validity or the public order and good customs. The reversion changes and confrontations caused by them are affected by many factors. It is necessary to set up the rules of change and confrontation from the point of view of the determination of the third party, the determination of the benchmark time, the priority of interest maintenance and so on. The reversion of property right and the rules of countermeasures when the contract of transfer of special movable property is revoked. Just like invalidity, there are many circumstances that lead to the cancellation of the contract. Based on the reprehensible circumstances of rescission, the reasons of rescission are divided into two types: the revocation caused by coercion and the revocation caused by non-coercion. According to the different reprehensible degree of the seller to the rescission of the contract, this paper analyzes the antagonistic effect of obtaining the ownership of the special movable property when the third party appears. The reversion change and antagonism of the real right of special movable property when the contract is terminated. Whether the effect of rescission of contract is direct or not and whether the third party has an important influence on the change and confrontation of real right, it is necessary to distinguish the effect of rescission of contract from the change of real right of special movable property and its antagonism. This paper only makes a brief analysis of the restorative change and countervailing effect of the real right of special movable property, the rules of which need the rich experience of theoretical research and judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】