我国互联网领域消费者自主选择权保护制度研究
[Abstract]:After the 21st century, we have entered the information age. Whether in life, study or work, Internet technology is closely related to us and has become a tool we rely on. Although Internet technology has changed our way of life and brought convenience to our lives, the lagging nature of the legal system and other aspects has led to the fact that the existing laws in some places do not fully meet our requirements for it. Therefore, in the actual operation process, there will be some problems, the emergence of problems in the use of Internet technology in the process of appearing some obstacles, especially in the field of Internet consumer choice protection issues worthy of our attention. Therefore, it is necessary for us to solve these problems as soon as possible. On the basis of reading the previous studies, the author expounds the infringement of consumers' independent right of choice in the field of Internet in China and its causes, and reasonably draws lessons from the relevant experiences of developed regions, and combines the actual situation of our country. To build the relevant and more feasible legal system to improve the proposal. The first chapter elaborates the basic theory, mainly involves the concept, the nature and the characteristic of the consumer's independent right of choice in our country, in order to lay the foundation for the research of the consumer's right of choice protection system in the Internet field of our country. The second part is from the current legal norms and actual judicial cases to explain the current situation of the protection system of consumer's independent right of choice in the field of Internet, and to reveal the problems of the independent right of choice in the field of Internet. And in-depth analysis of the causes of its problems. This paper analyzes the causes of the problems in the protection system of consumers' independent right of choice in the Internet field in China from four aspects: the system of formal contract, the system of supervision, the system of litigation and the system of compensation. The third part introduces the advanced experience of the United States, the United Kingdom and Hong Kong in the protection of consumers' right to choose, especially the experience of the United States' formal contract system and regulatory system. The advanced management experience of litigation system and supervision system in Britain and the small lawsuit system in Hong Kong are especially worthy of reference. And combined with the laws and regulations of the specific introduction of their main practices on these issues. The last part of this paper is the main part of the article, the purpose of this paper is to improve the Internet consumer choice protection in the area of litigation, compensation, supervision and electronic format contracts to improve the recommendations. Through the analysis of the above theory and practice, the author gives some reasonable suggestions and makes his own efforts for the development of China's Internet cause. By combining theory with practice and drawing lessons from the advanced systems in developed regions, this paper believes that this paper will make a little contribution to the perfection of consumer's independent right of choice protection system in the field of Internet in China, especially in the form of contract system. Supervision system, litigation system, compensation system, through in-depth analysis of the causes of the problems, concrete analysis of specific problems, to find a reasonable solution, It will be of great benefit to the improvement of consumer's right of choice protection system in the field of Internet in our country.
【学位授予单位】:华东师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923.8
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王兴运;“自主选择权”探析[J];理论导刊;2005年04期
2 刘磊;;消费者自主选择权含义之我见[J];决策与信息(财经观察);2008年04期
3 张煜;;基于食品安全的消费者自主选择权问题简析[J];法制与社会;2014年17期
4 宣炀;;消费者可以说“不”——自主选择权[J];女性天地;2011年03期
5 李瑛;;浅析旅游者知情权与自主选择权的保护[J];湖南工业职业技术学院学报;2008年04期
6 赵雪莹;;垃圾短信与消费者自主选择权相关问题的探讨[J];消费导刊;2009年02期
7 汤建辉;;论消费者自主选择权中的司法救济[J];求索;2011年03期
8 陈蓉;;论消费者自主选择权的保护——以数字电视为视角[J];财经理论与实践;2011年06期
9 郝晓兰;;试析消费者自主选择权的保护[J];法制与经济(中旬);2014年02期
10 刘建军 ,韩华胜;消费者享有“自主选择权”[J];健康;1996年05期
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 志芹 储娟 王晶;消费者享有自主选择权[N];市场报;2002年
2 本报记者 徐莹波 陈璇;商家“盯人服务”惹人烦[N];桂林日报;2009年
3 吴艳;“最低消费”是否合理 各方说法不一[N];扬州日报;2011年
4 北京市第二中级人民法院 孙兆晖;消费者自主选择权与跳单行为辨析[N];人民法院报;2013年
5 王紫;服务业设“最低消费”是否很霸道?[N];人民政协报;2009年
6 肖宏 徐永红;经营自主权不能损害消费者的知情权和自主选择权[N];人民法院报;2006年
7 舒锐;别再让消费者“跪着”用手机[N];法制日报;2014年
8 闻笛;将最低消费变为理性消费[N];中国企业报;2013年
9 记者 丁静 李亚红;最低消费合法?违法?[N];新华每日电讯;2013年
10 记者 任震宇;“能升不能降”涉强制交易[N];中国消费者报;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 范培;我国互联网领域消费者自主选择权保护制度研究[D];华东师范大学;2017年
2 杨光琳;论消费者自主选择权的实现[D];吉林大学;2015年
3 姜淑丽;网络用户自主选择权保护问题研究[D];北京邮电大学;2012年
4 刘娟;网络团购消费者自主选择权保护的研究[D];上海师范大学;2014年
,本文编号:2120616
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2120616.html