演绎作品的添附保护模式研究
发布时间：2018-07-21 15:53
【摘要】：我国现行演绎作品制度存在调整对象失灵且在归属以及行使规则方面存在利益失衡的弊端,不利于创新主体通过表达的新组合来突破旧表达模式的瓶颈。为了走出困境,本文试图在民法体系下探索演绎作品的添附规则,以完善演绎作品的调整对象、归属以及行使规则,促进文学艺术作品的持续创作,解决司法实践中在先作者与演绎人、社会公众的权利冲突问题并改善我国知识产权法与民法研究之间的隔阂化状态。本文除了绪论外,主要包括四个部分。第一部分阐述了我国现行演绎作品制度存在的缺陷。我国现行演绎作品制度的调整对象错位而陷入混乱的状态。一方面,它仅限于“改编、翻译、注释、整理”四种演绎形式,而不涵盖重混、同人创作等其他的二次创作行为;另一方面,司法实践中部分法院将不具有独创性的“古籍整理”视为“整理”这一演绎方式而给予其演绎作品的地位,误解了“整理”的内涵也背离了演绎作品制度保护“二次创作”的初衷。除此之外,我国现行演绎作品制度的归属以及行使规则未能有效地平衡在先作者、演绎人以及社会公众的利益而备受诟病。第二部分为了克服我国演绎作品制度的弊端,本文对演绎作品的保护模式进行了评析。首先,本文认为既有研究提出的演绎作品侵权保护论、著作权消极保护模式、版权封锁保护模式、不当得利保护模式仍然存在利益失衡的弊端,且大多仅适用于未经授权而创作的演绎作品的探讨,而无法有效地调整已授权演绎作品的法律关系。其次,为了进一步探索演绎作品的保护模式,本文回归“财产分配说”功能,提出了演绎作品的用益物权保护模式、相关权保护模式以及添附保护模式,并认为添附保护模式是目前演绎作品制度朝着利益均衡化改革的最佳方案。第三部分主要对演绎作品的添附保护模式进行论成。首先,其正当性体现为:古罗马的“板添画”、“字母添纸”现象以及添附理论内涵和外延的发展趋势为演绎作品的添附保护规则提供了历史依据;添附理论与侵权理论“各司其职”,不仅不会滋生侵权行为,其利益平衡的理念反而会促进二次创新;添附保护模式能够实现知识产权法与民法研究的对话。其次,其可行性表现为:演绎作品的添附保护规则能够与著作权制度有效融合。它符合“一物一权”的原则,能够有效区分善意添附和恶意添附,并能像有形物权一样对原作品和新增加的表达进行价值评估以补偿或者赔偿受损失者,且它并不会违反民事诉讼法的处分原则,在立法技术上“链接式”的模式能够实现物权法与知识产权单行法的协调。第四部分探讨演绎作品添附保护模式的规则构建。首先,明确“演绎作品”的调整对象,并采取抽象规定和开放式列举结合的方式对演绎作品的对象加以规定,演绎作品制度的调整对象为作者对已有作品进行改编、翻译、注释、整理等再创作,具有实质性区分的独创性且与原作品不可分离,表现为加工或附合类型的作品;演绎作品的构成要件包括它是在已有作品基础之上的再次创作,且与原作品不可分离;演绎行为须达到“实质性区分”的独创性标准;演绎作品的添附类型表现为加工、附合,但不包括混合。其次,讨论了演绎作品的归属。允许原作者和演绎人事先约定其权属,在没有约定或者约定不明之时,由其按份共有。最后,探析了演绎作品的行使规则。合法演绎的授权规则应参照《物权法》第八章关于共有的规则处理,并且其演绎作品的授权应当签订书面要式合同并向主管部门备案;而非法演绎作品的演绎人对于侵权演绎作品至少享有消极的著作权保护,但演绎人在主观上非恶意、不会损害原作者的正当利益以及涉及社会公共利益等因素的情况下,法院可以判令非法演绎作品“侵权不停止”,给予演绎人积极的著作权保护。
[Abstract]:In our present system of deductive works, there is a malfunction of the malfunction of adjusting objects and the imbalance of interest in attribution and exercise rules. It is not conducive to the innovation subject to break through the bottleneck of the old expression mode through the new combination of expression. In order to get out of the dilemma, this article tries to explore the supplementary rules of deductive works under the civil law system, so as to perfect the deduction. The object of adjustment, the ownership and the exercise of the rules, promote the continuous creation of literary and artistic works, solve the conflict of rights between the author and the deductive in the judicial practice, the conflict of rights of the public and improve the state of the intellectual property law and the study of civil law in our country. This article, in addition to the introduction, mainly includes four parts. The present system of deductive works in our country is defective. The adjustment object of the present system of deductive works in our country is in a state of confusion. On the one hand, it is limited to the four deductive forms of "adaptation, translation, annotation, arrangement", and other two other creative acts, such as remising, CO creation, etc.; on the other hand, partial law in judicial practice In addition to the original intention of the "two creation" in the deductive works system, the original intention of the "two creation" in the deductive works system is misunderstood. In order to overcome the drawbacks of the system of deductive works in our country, the second part of this article is to analyze the protection mode of the deductive works. Firstly, this paper considers that the theory of copyright infringement protection, the passive protection mode of copyright, the protection mode of copyright blockade, and the protection mode of the deductive works are discussed. The protection mode of unjust enrichment still exists the malpractice of the imbalance of interest, and most of it only applies to the discussion of the deductive works created without authorization, but it can not effectively adjust the legal relationship of the authorized deductive works. Secondly, in order to further explore the protection mode of the deductive works, this article returns to the function of "property distribution theory" and puts forward the deduction. The protection mode of usufructuary right in the works, the protection mode of relevant rights and the mode of appending protection are considered as the best scheme of the present deductive work system towards the balance of interests. The third part mainly deals with the supplementary protection mode of the deductive works. First, its legitimacy is embodied in the "plate painting" in ancient Rome. The phenomenon of "letter adding paper" and the development trend of the connotation and extension of the supplementary theory provide a historical basis for the supplementary protection rules of the deductive works; the theory and the theory of tort can not only give birth to the tort, but the idea of its balance of interests will promote the two innovation, and the protection mode can realize the knowledge. The feasibility of the dialogue between the law of property rights and the study of civil law is as follows: the supplementary protection rules of the deductive works can be effectively integrated with the copyright system. It conforms to the principle of "one thing and one right", which can effectively distinguish the bona fide additions and malicious additions, and can evaluate the value of the original work and the newly added expression like the tangible property. Compensation or compensation for the loser, and it does not violate the principle of the punishment of the civil procedure law, the "link" mode in the legislative technology can realize the coordination of the property law and the unilateral law of intellectual property. The fourth part discusses the rules construction of the deductive works appending protection mode. The object of deductive works is defined as the combination of abstract rules and open enumeration, and the object of the deductive work system is the author's adaptation, translation, annotation, arrangement, etc., the original creation of the original work, which is not separated from the original work, and is represented by the works of processing or attachment. The constituent elements of the product include the re creation on the basis of the existing work, which is not separated from the original work; the deductive behavior must reach the original standard of "substantive distinction"; the deductive type of work is represented by processing, attachment, but not mixing. Secondly, the attribution of deductive works is discussed. The original author and deductive personnel are allowed. In the end, the rules of the exercise of deductive works are discussed. The rule of authorization of the legal deduction should be referred to the rules of the eighth chapter of the property law, and the authorisation of his deductive works should be signed by the contract and put on record to the competent department. The deductive person of the deductive works enjoys at least negative copyright protection for the deductive works of tort, but in the case that the deductive person is not malicious, it will not harm the legitimate interests of the original author and the social public interests, the court can order the illegal deductive works "the infringement does not stop" and give the deductive active work. Protection of rights.
【学位授予单位】：西南交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.2
本文编号：2136018
[Abstract]:In our present system of deductive works, there is a malfunction of the malfunction of adjusting objects and the imbalance of interest in attribution and exercise rules. It is not conducive to the innovation subject to break through the bottleneck of the old expression mode through the new combination of expression. In order to get out of the dilemma, this article tries to explore the supplementary rules of deductive works under the civil law system, so as to perfect the deduction. The object of adjustment, the ownership and the exercise of the rules, promote the continuous creation of literary and artistic works, solve the conflict of rights between the author and the deductive in the judicial practice, the conflict of rights of the public and improve the state of the intellectual property law and the study of civil law in our country. This article, in addition to the introduction, mainly includes four parts. The present system of deductive works in our country is defective. The adjustment object of the present system of deductive works in our country is in a state of confusion. On the one hand, it is limited to the four deductive forms of "adaptation, translation, annotation, arrangement", and other two other creative acts, such as remising, CO creation, etc.; on the other hand, partial law in judicial practice In addition to the original intention of the "two creation" in the deductive works system, the original intention of the "two creation" in the deductive works system is misunderstood. In order to overcome the drawbacks of the system of deductive works in our country, the second part of this article is to analyze the protection mode of the deductive works. Firstly, this paper considers that the theory of copyright infringement protection, the passive protection mode of copyright, the protection mode of copyright blockade, and the protection mode of the deductive works are discussed. The protection mode of unjust enrichment still exists the malpractice of the imbalance of interest, and most of it only applies to the discussion of the deductive works created without authorization, but it can not effectively adjust the legal relationship of the authorized deductive works. Secondly, in order to further explore the protection mode of the deductive works, this article returns to the function of "property distribution theory" and puts forward the deduction. The protection mode of usufructuary right in the works, the protection mode of relevant rights and the mode of appending protection are considered as the best scheme of the present deductive work system towards the balance of interests. The third part mainly deals with the supplementary protection mode of the deductive works. First, its legitimacy is embodied in the "plate painting" in ancient Rome. The phenomenon of "letter adding paper" and the development trend of the connotation and extension of the supplementary theory provide a historical basis for the supplementary protection rules of the deductive works; the theory and the theory of tort can not only give birth to the tort, but the idea of its balance of interests will promote the two innovation, and the protection mode can realize the knowledge. The feasibility of the dialogue between the law of property rights and the study of civil law is as follows: the supplementary protection rules of the deductive works can be effectively integrated with the copyright system. It conforms to the principle of "one thing and one right", which can effectively distinguish the bona fide additions and malicious additions, and can evaluate the value of the original work and the newly added expression like the tangible property. Compensation or compensation for the loser, and it does not violate the principle of the punishment of the civil procedure law, the "link" mode in the legislative technology can realize the coordination of the property law and the unilateral law of intellectual property. The fourth part discusses the rules construction of the deductive works appending protection mode. The object of deductive works is defined as the combination of abstract rules and open enumeration, and the object of the deductive work system is the author's adaptation, translation, annotation, arrangement, etc., the original creation of the original work, which is not separated from the original work, and is represented by the works of processing or attachment. The constituent elements of the product include the re creation on the basis of the existing work, which is not separated from the original work; the deductive behavior must reach the original standard of "substantive distinction"; the deductive type of work is represented by processing, attachment, but not mixing. Secondly, the attribution of deductive works is discussed. The original author and deductive personnel are allowed. In the end, the rules of the exercise of deductive works are discussed. The rule of authorization of the legal deduction should be referred to the rules of the eighth chapter of the property law, and the authorisation of his deductive works should be signed by the contract and put on record to the competent department. The deductive person of the deductive works enjoys at least negative copyright protection for the deductive works of tort, but in the case that the deductive person is not malicious, it will not harm the legitimate interests of the original author and the social public interests, the court can order the illegal deductive works "the infringement does not stop" and give the deductive active work. Protection of rights.
【学位授予单位】：西南交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刁舜;;添附理论视角下的从属专利保护研究[J];中国发明与专利;2016年11期
2 刁舜;;添附理论视角下的非法演绎作品保护研究[J];电子知识产权;2016年08期
3 阮开欣;;演绎作品的合理使用问题研究——以Keeling v. Hars案为视角[J];中国版权;2016年03期
4 林莺;;同人作品合法性问题探究[J];中国版权;2015年05期
5 孙玉芸;;论演绎作品的固定性[J];武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版);2015年02期
6 胡开忠;;论重混创作行为的法律规制[J];法学;2014年12期
7 李琛;;知识产权法基本功能之重解[J];知识产权;2014年07期
8 特莎·雷森;徐国栋;;罗马法中绘画创作引起的添附问题——对已画之板问题学派争鸣的地方论①解释[J];厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2014年01期
9 张耕;贾小龙;;专利“侵权不停止”理论新解及立法完善——基于当事人之间的利益衡量[J];知识产权;2013年11期
10 陈家宏;;专利添附问题探讨[J];知识产权;2013年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 郭雨洒;著作权共有制度研究[D];郑州大学;2015年
2 杨露;论非法演绎作品的保护[D];西南政法大学;2012年
3 刘友华;论知识产权权利冲突及其协调[D];湘潭大学;2003年
，本文编号：2136018
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2136018.html
