我国知识产权确权机制的冲突与完善

发布时间：2018-07-21 16:24

【摘要】：我国的知识产权确权机制是一种典型的行政司法双轨保护机制。实践中的知识产权确权程序繁琐、效率低下,"循环诉讼"的状况时有发生,导致当事人权益难以得到及时保护,并浪费大量的司法行政资源。其根源在于双轨制模式下的知识产权确权制度中还存在行政确权与侵权诉讼标准不统一、行政确权与司法审查之间缺乏衔接等矛盾和冲突,而正在进行的立法修改未能从根本上克服上述问题,甚至还可能带来权利效力不确定等新问题。因此,基于我国的行政司法实践,从短期现实选择和长远终极理想层面分别提出增设前置程序和建立知识产权法院两个方案,以期更好地发挥行政机关的能动性,提高行政保护和司法保护的整体合力,完善我国知识产权确权机制。
[Abstract]:The mechanism of confirming intellectual property right in our country is a typical dual-track protection mechanism of administrative justice. The procedure of confirming intellectual property rights in practice is cumbersome and inefficient, and the situation of "circular litigation" occurs from time to time, which makes it difficult to protect the rights and interests of the parties in time and wastes a large number of judicial and administrative resources. Its root lies in the contradiction and conflict between the administrative confirmation right and the tort litigation standard and the lack of connection between the administrative confirmation right and the judicial review in the system of confirming the intellectual property right under the dual-track system. The current legislative changes have not fundamentally overcome these problems, and may even lead to new problems such as uncertainty of the validity of rights. Therefore, on the basis of our country's administrative judicial practice, two schemes are put forward from the aspects of short-term realistic choice and long-term ultimate ideal respectively to establish intellectual property court and pre-procedure, in order to give full play to the active role of administrative organs. Improve the overall joint force of administrative protection and judicial protection, and improve the mechanism of confirming intellectual property rights in China.
【作者单位】：中南大学知识产权研究院;
【基金】：湖南省知识产权战略实施专项项目“专利纠纷行政调解协议司法确认程序研究”(2014S软009)
【分类号】：D923.4

【参考文献】