著作权法第三次修订的问题及送审稿可适用于图书馆之著作权限制条款修改建议

发布时间：2018-07-24 14:12

【摘要】：我国《著作权法(修订草案送审稿)》至今未见交付全国人大审议,足见利益博弈之激烈、各方分歧之严重、利益平衡之重要。文章对送审稿与现行法可适用于图书馆之著作权限制条款进行了对比;分析了《著作权法》第三次修订的问题有修订工作专家委员会的代表性严重不足,法律修订过于滞后且缺乏系统性,送审稿未能解决本次修订必须解决的关键问题等。探析了设立可适用于图书馆之著作权限制的法理依据,对当前适度扩大可适用于图书馆之著作权限制是知识信息的传播和使用方式发生巨大变化,以及提高国民科学文化素质,便于教学和科学研究,促进国家发展、民族振兴的现实需要,进而提出了几点对送审稿可适用于图书馆之著作权限制条款的修改建议。
[Abstract]:China's copyright Law (revised draft) has not been submitted to the National people's Congress for examination, which shows that the interests of the game is fierce, the serious differences between the parties, and the importance of the balance of interests. This paper makes a comparison between the draft submitted for review and the copyright restriction clause applicable to the library under the current law, and analyzes the problem of the third revision of the copyright Law, which has the serious lack of representativeness of the Committee of experts on revision. The revision of the law is too late and lack of systematization, and the draft submitted for review fails to solve the key problems that must be solved in this revision. This paper probes into the legal basis for the establishment of copyright restrictions that can be applied to libraries, and that the moderate expansion of copyright restrictions applicable to libraries is a great change in the dissemination and use of knowledge and information, as well as the improvement of the quality of national science and culture. It is convenient for teaching and scientific research to promote the development of the country and the realistic need of national rejuvenation. Furthermore, several suggestions are put forward to amend the copyright restriction clauses which can be applied to the library by submitting manuscripts for review.
【作者单位】：华中师范大学图书馆;华中师范大学外国语学院;
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】