沉默承诺研究
发布时间：2018-07-28 16:31
【摘要】：本文主要是关于沉默承诺相关问题的探讨。所谓沉默承诺是指受要约人在收到要约人的要约之后,没有作出任何积极反应而抱以沉默态度,并被认定为承诺的行为。目前,关于沉默承诺,我国学界对此研究较少,可供指导司法实践的法学理论更是缺乏,同时,我国法律对沉默承诺也没有明确的规定,但是实际生活中却有种种特殊情形,需要把这些情形下的沉默认定为承诺,才能更好地维护双方当事人的利益平衡,促进交易的顺利完成及安全。本文主要运用比较分析、实证研究、规范考察等方法,对两大法系的典型国家关于沉默承诺的态度及学界研究加以概括总结及比较评析,最后得出初步结论。除引言和结语外,正文共分为四个部分。第一部分主要包括三个方面,一是介绍关于沉默承诺的基础理论,为进一步理论研究做准备;二是对沉默承诺的概念加以界定;三是指出该研究的价值所在。第二部分主要是从各国制定法、司法实践及学界研究等方面出发,通过对两大法系几个典型国家关于沉默承诺的态度加以考察,概括归纳出各个国家关于沉默承诺的适用情形,并对不同国家间的区别予以比较和评析。第三部分主要是对我国关于沉默承诺的态度,从制定法和学界研究角度予以考察,并对其进行比较评析,在此基础上指出笔者的观点,这也是本文的重点所在。第四部分主要是通过对相关司法案例进行研究与评析,并以此来对我国司法实践中关于沉默承诺的作法加以考察。本文的创新之处在于,鉴于目前我国法律对沉默承诺没有明确规定,学界关于沉默承诺的理论研究匮乏,并因此,在司法实践中不能形成统一的认识等种种情况,本文指出了我国当前关于沉默承诺应当怎么做以及在什么情况下适用沉默承诺较为合理与正当。
[Abstract]:This paper is mainly about silence commitment related issues. The so-called silent acceptance refers to the offeree who, after receiving the offeree's offer, adopts a silent attitude without any positive reaction and is regarded as the acceptance. At present, there is little research on silence commitment in Chinese academic circles, and there is a lack of legal theory to guide judicial practice. At the same time, there is no clear stipulation on silence commitment in Chinese law, but there are various special situations in real life. In order to maintain the balance of the interests of both parties and promote the smooth completion and security of the transaction, it is necessary to regard the silence in these situations as a promise. By means of comparative analysis, empirical research and normative investigation, this paper summarizes and compares the attitude and academic research on silence commitment in typical countries of the two legal systems, and finally draws a preliminary conclusion. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the text is divided into four parts. The first part mainly includes three aspects, one is to introduce the basic theory of silence commitment, to prepare for further theoretical research; the other is to define the concept of silence commitment; third, to point out the value of the study. The second part is mainly from the aspects of national law, judicial practice and academic research, through the investigation of the attitude of several typical countries of the two legal systems on silence commitment, summed up the application of each country about silence commitment. The differences between different countries are compared and evaluated. The third part mainly studies the attitude of silence commitment in China from the point of view of statutory law and academic research, and makes a comparative analysis of it. On this basis, it points out the author's point of view, which is also the focus of this paper. The fourth part is mainly through the research and evaluation of the relevant judicial cases, and in order to investigate the practice of silence commitment in our judicial practice. The innovation of this paper is that, in view of the fact that there is no clear stipulation on silence commitment in our country's law at present, there is a lack of theoretical research on silence promise in academic circles, and therefore, there is no uniform understanding in judicial practice, and so on. This paper points out that it is reasonable and reasonable to apply silence promise in our country at present.
【学位授予单位】：南京大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D913
[Abstract]:This paper is mainly about silence commitment related issues. The so-called silent acceptance refers to the offeree who, after receiving the offeree's offer, adopts a silent attitude without any positive reaction and is regarded as the acceptance. At present, there is little research on silence commitment in Chinese academic circles, and there is a lack of legal theory to guide judicial practice. At the same time, there is no clear stipulation on silence commitment in Chinese law, but there are various special situations in real life. In order to maintain the balance of the interests of both parties and promote the smooth completion and security of the transaction, it is necessary to regard the silence in these situations as a promise. By means of comparative analysis, empirical research and normative investigation, this paper summarizes and compares the attitude and academic research on silence commitment in typical countries of the two legal systems, and finally draws a preliminary conclusion. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the text is divided into four parts. The first part mainly includes three aspects, one is to introduce the basic theory of silence commitment, to prepare for further theoretical research; the other is to define the concept of silence commitment; third, to point out the value of the study. The second part is mainly from the aspects of national law, judicial practice and academic research, through the investigation of the attitude of several typical countries of the two legal systems on silence commitment, summed up the application of each country about silence commitment. The differences between different countries are compared and evaluated. The third part mainly studies the attitude of silence commitment in China from the point of view of statutory law and academic research, and makes a comparative analysis of it. On this basis, it points out the author's point of view, which is also the focus of this paper. The fourth part is mainly through the research and evaluation of the relevant judicial cases, and in order to investigate the practice of silence commitment in our judicial practice. The innovation of this paper is that, in view of the fact that there is no clear stipulation on silence commitment in our country's law at present, there is a lack of theoretical research on silence promise in academic circles, and therefore, there is no uniform understanding in judicial practice, and so on. This paper points out that it is reasonable and reasonable to apply silence promise in our country at present.
【学位授予单位】：南京大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D913
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吴继锋,庄世超;论要约[J];黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报;2000年04期
2 赵伯祥;试论逾期承诺的效力与要约人的选择权[J];企业经济;2004年09期
3 余正;;对两种特殊的要约答复的思考[J];现代经济(现代物业下半月刊);2007年04期
4 夏斗寅;涉外经济合同的要约和承诺(上)[J];外国经济与管理;1988年03期
5 耿军,常友好;国际货物买卖合同要约承诺比较[J];大连党校学报;1996年03期
6 马志荣;要约规则之管见[J];市场经济管理;1996年02期
7 钱玉林;;论要约内容的确定性[J];南京大学法律评论;2000年01期
8 范黎药;略论对强制要约制度适用范围的合理界定——兼谈对《证券法》第81条的完善[J];法学;2000年01期
9 孙宇;浅谈要约和承诺[J];北方论丛;2000年03期
10 康拉德·茨威格特,海因·克茨,孙宪忠;三大法系的要约与承诺制度[J];外国法译评;2000年02期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 崔秀东;;要约[A];河北省教师教育学会第二届中小学教师教学案例展论文集[C];2013年
2 方国庆;;合同法要约与承诺制度对提单货物运输合同的影响[A];中国律师2002海商研讨会论文集[C];2002年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 北京市中盛律师事务所 刘会利律师;国际货物买卖合同订立中的要约问题[N];国际商报;2002年
2 谢东s，
本文编号：2150889
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2150889.html
