对一起医疗损害赔偿纠纷案的法律分析

发布时间：2018-09-05 20:19

【摘要】：本文以《对一起医疗损害赔偿纠纷案的法律分析》为题,从案例入手,分析了医疗损害责任的构成要件,司法实务中此类纠纷在案由选择、举证责任分配、医学鉴定、法律适用方面的争议问题,在结构上共分为五个部分。第一部分引言,综合分析医患纠纷、医患关系现状；第二部分介绍案件的基本情况、争议焦点、审理过程和判决结果,引出论文所要探讨的核心问题；第三部分,对照案例分析医疗损害赔偿构成要件,医院在实施医疗行为过程中的过错是否构成医疗侵权；第四部分就医疗纠纷案件案由的选择、举证责任的分配、医疗技术鉴定、法律适用几方面进行分析论述；第五部分从法律制度、配套制度上对完善医患纠纷案件处理机制提出思考和建议。本文采用案例分析和实证研究的方法,就人民法院在此类案件审理中出现医疗鉴定“二元化”、案由选择“多元化”、法律适用不一、举证责任不均衡现象进行分析梳理,并与《侵权责任法》关于医疗损害责任的规定对照研究,解读《侵权责任法》实施后,上述问题已解决和司法实践中仍然存在的情况,分析对策,以期对医患双方合法权益维护有所裨益。
[Abstract]:Based on a legal analysis of a dispute over compensation for medical damages, this paper, starting with a case study, analyzes the constitutive elements of the liability for medical damage, including the choice of the cause of the case, the distribution of the burden of proof, and the medical expertise in judicial practice. The dispute on the application of law is divided into five parts. The first part of the introduction, comprehensive analysis of doctor-patient disputes, doctor-patient relationship status; the second part introduces the basic situation of the case, the focus of the dispute, the trial process and the outcome of the judgment, leading to the core issues to be discussed in the paper; part three, Compared with the case analysis of medical damage compensation elements, the hospital in the implementation of medical behavior in the process of whether the fault constitutes medical tort; the fourth part on the choice of medical dispute cases, the distribution of the burden of proof, medical technology identification, The fifth part puts forward some thoughts and suggestions on perfecting the handling mechanism of doctor-patient dispute cases from the legal system and supporting system. Using the method of case analysis and empirical study, this paper analyzes and combs the phenomenon that the people's court has dualized medical appraisal in the trial of such cases, the choice of the case is "diversified", the application of the law is different, and the burden of proof is not balanced. Comparing with the provisions of the Tort liability Law on the liability for Medical damage, the author interprets the above problems that still exist in the judicial practice after the implementation of the Tort liability Law, and analyzes the countermeasures. In order to maintain the legitimate rights and interests of both doctors and patients to benefit.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923

【共引文献】